«

http://www.photo-forums.com/WebX?4651.12@.ee94123/727!enclosure=.ee96ff9

On Fri, 2 Jan 2004 05:37:05 -0000, "Marc" <>
wrote:

>http://www.photo-forums.com/WebX?4651.12@.ee94123/727!enclosure=.ee96ff9
>
UMMMMMMM----That's not a very good picture. Underexposed and some
really strange looking noise.

Are we talking the new Sony 8MP here?? Surely there are better
examples.
**************************
Mark Herring, Pasadena, Calif.
Private e-mail: Just say no to "No".

How about noise.

"Marc" <> wrote in message
news:Yr7Jb.15083$...
>
http://www.photo-forums.com/WebX?4651.12@.ee94123/727!enclosure=.ee96ff9
>
>

"Marc" <> wrote in message
news:Yr7Jb.15083$...
>
http://www.photo-forums.com/WebX?4651.12@.ee94123/727!enclosure=.ee96ff9

Noted, and kill-filed.

We don't need any more George Preddy types here.

"Marc" <> wrote in message
news:Yr7Jb.15083$...
>
http://www.photo-forums.com/WebX?4651.12@.ee94123/727!enclosure=.ee96ff9
>
>

My VGA mobile phone camera has less noise than that.

-Adam

"Marc" <> wrote in message
news:Yr7Jb.15083$...
>
http://www.photo-forums.com/WebX?4651.12@.ee94123/727!enclosur
e=.ee96ff9
>
>

This is some sort of joke right? I don't believe I've ever seen such a bad
digital photograph. Strike that. Such a dark collection of randomly
coloured noise.

¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Only 400 ISO !!!!!!!!

Filename : Dsc00391.jpg
JFIF_APP1 : Exif
Main Information
ImageDescription :
Make : SONY
Model : DSC-F828
DateTime : 2003:01:13 06:20:39
Sub Information
ExposureTime : 1/640Sec
FNumber : F3,2
ExposureProgram : Manual
ISOSpeedRatings : 400
ExifVersion : 0220
DateTimeOriginal : 2003:01:13 06:20:39
DateTimeDigitized : 2003:01:13 06:20:39
CompressedBitsPerPixel : 8/1 (bit/pixel)
ExposureBiasValue : EV0,0
MaxApertureValue : F2,0
MeteringMode : Division
LightSource : Flash
Flash : Fired
FocalLength : 7,10(mm)
ExifImageWidth : 3264
ExifImageHeight : 2448
ExposureMode : Manual
WhiteBalance : Manual
SceneCaptureType : Standard
Contrast : Normal
Saturation : Normal
Sharpness : Hard
Vendor Original Information


???????????????????

"Mark M" <> wrote in
news:9D9Jb.215717$J77.149107@fed1read07:

>
> "Marc" <> wrote in message
> news:Yr7Jb.15083$...
>>
> http://www.photo-forums.com/WebX?233...2@.ee94123/727
> !enclosure=.ee96ff9
>
> Noted, and kill-filed.
>
> We don't need any more George Preddy types here.

Did you bother to look at the photo? He was being sarcastic, to say
the least.

--
Scott

"Marc" <> wrote in message
news:Yr7Jb.15083$...
>
http://www.photo-forums.com/WebX?4651.12@.ee94123/727!enclosure=.ee96ff9
>
>

Maybe you were being sarcastic?

Marc <> wrote:
> http://www.photo-forums.com/WebX?4651.12@.ee94123/727!enclosure=.ee96ff9

Is that a Manet or a Monet?

Andrew