«

Now this isn't even funny any more Georgey boy, this is a current ad for the
SD-10 in the UK, featuring an SD10 picture. You can clearly see where Sigma
have had the eyelashes re-touched - presumably to hide the awful jaggies.

what a crock of sh@t

full ad: http://www.pbase.com/image/24335797

crop of eyelashes: http://www.pbase.com/image/24335816

gallery: http://www.pbase.com/preddytor/

Betty Swallocks wrote:

> Now this isn't even funny any more Georgey boy, this is a current ad
> for the SD-10 in the UK, featuring an SD10 picture. You can clearly
> see where Sigma have had the eyelashes re-touched - presumably to
> hide the awful jaggies.
>
> what a crock of sh@t
>
> full ad: http://www.pbase.com/image/24335797


BUSTED!!!!!!

"Paolo Pizzi" <> wrote in message
news:WrvFb.1479$ ...
> Betty Swallocks wrote:
>
> > Now this isn't even funny any more Georgey boy, this is a current ad
> > for the SD-10 in the UK, featuring an SD10 picture. You can clearly
> > see where Sigma have had the eyelashes re-touched - presumably to
> > hide the awful jaggies.
> >
> > what a crock of sh@t
> >
> > full ad: http://www.pbase.com/image/24335797
>
>
> BUSTED!!!!!!

Where exactly?

I still haven't seen your full size eyelash shot, why haven't you posted one
from your blurry Canon 1Ds? Here's a 100% crop using an $80 lens, the Sigma
ad is (obviously) way conservative...

http://www.pbase.com/image/24351586/original


"Betty Swallocks" <bettytrailertrash&> wrote in message
news:bs5b6t$h6r$...
> Now this isn't even funny any more Georgey boy, this is a current ad for
the
> SD-10 in the UK, featuring an SD10 picture. You can clearly see where
Sigma
> have had the eyelashes re-touched - presumably to hide the awful jaggies.
>
> what a crock of sh@t
>
> full ad: http://www.pbase.com/image/24335797
>
> crop of eyelashes: http://www.pbase.com/image/24335816
>
> gallery: http://www.pbase.com/preddytor/
>
>