«

In message <bpa2bi$mo5$>,
"George Preddy" <> wrote:

>They are about the same, both go multi-colored speckled at ISO 400:
>http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos10d/page18.asp

How can you look at this and declare that "They are about the same"?
Are you as blind as a bat, or are you very loose with the term "same"?
--

<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>>< ><<>
John P Sheehy <>
><<> <>>< <>>< ><<> <>>< ><<> ><<> <>><

Annika1980 wrote:
>
> Now the truth can be told!
>
> http://www.pbase.com/image/23330194/original


Ha ha, what the hell is it???
You just made my day!

Thomas

George Preddy <> wrote:
>"Bill M" <> wrote in message

>> >99% refuse to believe Bayer interpolates too.
>> >
>> God your full of it.,.nobody here has claimed Bayer doesn't
>> interpolate color...
>
>Keep going... it interpolates color, and... it interpolates
>spatially--scales interpolated-output images up 4:1 over the amount of RGB

George is lying. There is no 4:1 scaling anywhere.

--
Ray Fischer

<> wrote in message
news:...
> In message <bpa2bi$mo5$>,
> "George Preddy" <> wrote:
>
> >They are about the same, both go multi-colored speckled at ISO 400:
> >http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos10d/page18.asp
>
> How can you look at this and declare that "They are about the same"?
> Are you as blind as a bat, or are you very loose with the term "same"?

They are both close enough considering the much cleaner (beta) SD9 samples
posted on the site.

The SD9 took another big leap in noise reduction since dpreview posted those
beta samples. Firmware v2.0 yesterday--even more significant difference
than the production firmare had over the beta test dpreview still has
posted.

George Preddy <> wrote:
><> wrote in message
>> "George Preddy" <> wrote:
>>
>> >They are about the same, both go multi-colored speckled at ISO 400:
>> >http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos10d/page18.asp
>>
>> How can you look at this and declare that "They are about the same"?
>> Are you as blind as a bat, or are you very loose with the term "same"?
>
>They are both close enough considering the much cleaner (beta) SD9 samples
>posted on the site.

If one actually go to the web site and looks at the actual findings
one will see that, as usual, George is a bald-faced liar.

The SD-9 is noiser at all ISO settings than is the 10D

--
Ray Fischer