>Subject: Re: Is the D30 worthwhile?
>From: "TiredRob"
>Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
>Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 12:44:28 +0000 (UTC)
>Organization: BT Openworld
>Lines: 16
>Message-ID: <bnr13c$ims$>
>References: < >
>NNTP-Posting-Host: host81-129-58-38.in-addr.btopenworld.com
>X-Trace: hercules.btinternet.com 1067517868 19164 81.129.58.38 (30 Oct 2003
>12:44:28 GMT)
>X-Complaints-To: news-
>NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 12:44:28 +0000 (UTC)
>X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-Priority: 3
>X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
>Path:
>lobby!ngtf-m01.news.aol.com!ngpeer.news.aol.com!newsstand.cit .cornell.edu
!news.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.tele.dk!ne ws.tele.dk!small.news.te
le.dk!news-fra1.dfn.de!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!news.uni-stuttgart.de!ca
rbon.eu.sun.com!btnet-feed5
>!btnet!news.btopenworld.com!not-for-mail
>
>
>
>
>"CARBUFF" <> wrote in message
>news:. com...
>> Come to think of it. I've already decided that the D30 is a useless
>> piece of ****. Why the **** should I buy another outdated camera,
>> considering all of my other cameras are dinosaurs...
>
>
>Umm,
>
>If you already decided the D30 is a "useless piece of ****" (I'd be
>interested to hear on what grounds, and when it became that) then why ask ?
>
>Rob.
Not my post. Check the headers. Troll alert!
George