(Savidge4) writes:
>I have found that if you acuratly match your photo resolution with your TV
>resolution you will get the results *YOU* want and not the results of a
>conversion. for standard TV I create photos that are 720x480 at 200 DPI and
>get great results.
That won't necessarily work; it depends on your frame buffer (graphics
card) and software.
Ordinary TV sets are 4:3 aspect ratio. An image that will just fit the
screen while using square pixels (the usual default in digital
photography) is 640x480 for NTSC (larger for PAL).
Now, digital video hardware normally uses non-square pixels, and 720x480
is standard for an NTSC image. If you want to put a digicam image in
this format, you'll have to *first* crop it to 4:3 (either 640x480 or
720x540) to get the right shape, then resize it to 720x480 to get the
proper aspect ratio non-square pixels. Then you have to load it into
a frame buffer that will actually display the non-square pixels
properly.
If you just crop a digicam image to 720x480, you have a 3:2 aspect ratio
image being displayed on a 4:3 aspect ratio screen, and the image will
be "squeezed" horizontally.
Conversely, if you acquire a digital video image that is 720x480, you
need to resize it to either 640x480 or 720x540 to make things appear
the right shape on a computer. If you don't believe me, just shoot
something that is round with a digicam and a video camera, import the
images, and display on computer monitor or TV. If a round object turns
elliptical, your image is distorted.
Normally, computer frame buffers and monitors are set up for square
pixels, and graphics cards with NTSC output (unless they are specialist
items intended for video editing) also display square pixels. So the
displayed size is 640x480 or something close to that.
Dave