"Jim Dalton" <> wrote in message
news:...
> I just got my Epson 2200 printer and so far, so good.
>
> Now, I'm trying to get my prints as close as possible to what I am
> seeing on my monitor. I know I need to do a little calibrating, but
> what system should I be calibrating?
>
> Should it be my monitor, my printer or should I get a calibration
> system for my monitor and another for my printer?
>
> In looking around the web, I came across this website:
>
http://www.imagingspectrum.com/cgi-l...html?E+scstore
>
> Here they have the Spyder with OptiCal for Monitor Calibration as well
> as the PrintFIX Inkjet Printer Profiler.
>
> I will probably buy from B&H, but before I do, I want to get a little
> feedback from people on their own experiences and such.
I assume you're using CMS aware software, such as Photoshop or PS Elements?
If not, profiles won't do you any good. As for profiling, you need a
monitor calibration system that will calibrate and profile your monitor, and
then you need profiles for each and every paper that you will use.
The spyder and Optical package is a very good monitor calibration
system...not as good as EyeOne, but then again it doesn't cost $600 either.
I can't speak for the PrintFIX Profiler since I use custom profiles. If
you're only going to use 2 papers (say Epson Enhanced Matte, and a
Glossy/Semi-Glossy paper of your choice - I'd personally recommend
Pictorico), you're better off spending $200 for 2 custom profiles which will
be *far* more accurate, and pocket the extra $100 that you'd have to spend
for the Profiler package. Either that, or spend it on another stick of RAM.
Just a thought.