Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Computing > Digital Photography > Re: 98 vs. XP for digital photography

Reply
Thread Tools

Re: 98 vs. XP for digital photography

 
 
Dragan Cvetkovic
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      07-11-2003
SD <> writes:

> Conclusion:
> 98SE = similar to XP Home
> XP Pro = Way better than both of them..
>


I wouldn't say that XP Pro is much better than XP Home. Listed differences
on http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/whichxp.asp don't really justify "the
way better" classification of yours.

Bye, Dragan

--
Dragan Cvetkovic,

To be or not to be is true. G. Boole No it isn't. L. E. J. Brouwer
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Call for Digital Art and Photography from L.A. Center for Digital Art Rex Bruce Digital Photography 0 02-22-2008 06:44 PM
"A Digital Photography Odyssey, Volume 1: The Digital Lens" at XYZ Computing Silverstrand Front Page News 0 11-18-2005 12:28 AM
Digital Photography Tip #1: Avoid using the digital zoom feature Gary Hendricks Digital Photography 6 12-05-2004 12:45 AM
Digital Photography RFD: rec.photo.digital.slr vs rec.photo.digital.slr-systems? Lionel Digital Photography 16 09-17-2004 12:48 PM
[Meta] *Poll Results* Proposed new, moderated digital photography group (rec.photo.digital.moderated) Lionel Digital Photography 27 07-15-2004 11:24 AM



Advertisments
 



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57