Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Computing > Digital Photography > Re: Macro and High res woes

Reply
Thread Tools

Re: Macro and High res woes

 
 
Tesselator
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      06-29-2003



> > Someone should make a FAQ if there isn't one already, of the "ideal"
> > features to look for in a digital camera. Like:
> >
> > The ability to go manual in as many aspects as possible.
> > The ability to store and transfer uncompressed images.


> Not that many people shoot uncompressed on consumer level cameras.
> The quality difference is hardly noticeable compared with shooting
> at low compression(SHG?), yet shooting uncompressed yeilds
> files that are much larger, and the much lower number of images
> per flash card can be very annoying.


True.. Perhapps I should have specified "lossless" in opposition
to "lossy" compressions, and/or etc. But hey, I was being general.




> > The ability to add attachements (PC, Hotshoe, Tripod mount, lens filters, etc.)
> >
> > Readable LCD menus
> > Tilt/Rotate/Swivel LCD Pannels.
> > All glass (coated) lens elements.
> > Other than plastic body frame,
> > USB or Serial Camera Control via computer or etc. (other than downloading)
> > Etc.
> > Etc.
> > Etc.
> >
> > And thier _simple_ respective explaination. Like:
> >
> > USB/Ser. Cam. Control -- Will allow you to to create ultra hi res stop motion
> > and time-laps motion sequences.



> Very few people do this.


True. But those not in-the-know may assume USB means Cam Control. Actually,
this technique has been gaining in popularity ever since "The Matrix" introduced
"bullet-time" effects using this technique several years ago. Even tho "Bullet
Time" is a Multi Camera effect.


> > Non-Plastic Cam Body -- Will save you a trip to the repair shop if you drop
> > the thing.
> >
> > Etc.
> > Etc.
> > Etc.
> >
> > Anyone know of a faq like that?

>



But good points -- Maybe the FAQ should include a popularity rating?





 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Eyron
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      06-29-2003
My Nikon Coolpix 5000 has a 2cm macro which is 3/4 of an inch.
Some sonys are 1cm.

This Nikon is amazing for macro.

Im going to try reversing a Nikon 50/1.8 on it for larger than 1:1 ratio.

Eyron
"Tesselator" <> wrote in message
news:bdlrnf$k2o$...
>
>
>
> > > Someone should make a FAQ if there isn't one already, of the "ideal"
> > > features to look for in a digital camera. Like:
> > >
> > > The ability to go manual in as many aspects as possible.
> > > The ability to store and transfer uncompressed images.

>
> > Not that many people shoot uncompressed on consumer level cameras.
> > The quality difference is hardly noticeable compared with shooting
> > at low compression(SHG?), yet shooting uncompressed yeilds
> > files that are much larger, and the much lower number of images
> > per flash card can be very annoying.

>
> True.. Perhapps I should have specified "lossless" in opposition
> to "lossy" compressions, and/or etc. But hey, I was being general.
>
>
>
>
> > > The ability to add attachements (PC, Hotshoe, Tripod mount, lens

filters, etc.)
> > >
> > > Readable LCD menus
> > > Tilt/Rotate/Swivel LCD Pannels.
> > > All glass (coated) lens elements.
> > > Other than plastic body frame,
> > > USB or Serial Camera Control via computer or etc. (other than

downloading)
> > > Etc.
> > > Etc.
> > > Etc.
> > >
> > > And thier _simple_ respective explaination. Like:
> > >
> > > USB/Ser. Cam. Control -- Will allow you to to create ultra hi res

stop motion
> > > and time-laps motion sequences.

>
>
> > Very few people do this.

>
> True. But those not in-the-know may assume USB means Cam Control.

Actually,
> this technique has been gaining in popularity ever since "The Matrix"

introduced
> "bullet-time" effects using this technique several years ago. Even tho

"Bullet
> Time" is a Multi Camera effect.
>
>
> > > Non-Plastic Cam Body -- Will save you a trip to the repair shop if

you drop
> > > the thing.
> > >
> > > Etc.
> > > Etc.
> > > Etc.
> > >
> > > Anyone know of a faq like that?

> >

>
>
> But good points -- Maybe the FAQ should include a popularity rating?
>
>
>
>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Tesselator
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      06-29-2003

> The salesman at Costco told me he has an C5050 at home and tried using the
> Super Macro of 1" to eight 8" and found that he could not get a good
> predictable focus and promised to send me the examples he tried With the
> super Macro.


I would guess that this is why he remains to be a salesman as Costco.

O


> He said that looking at the display was inacurate in terms of
> what he expected and what he got was not predictavle in Super Macro.
>
> He Sugested I lock the focus at some distance and try focussing by moving in
> and out untill it is the best focus I can get.
>


Yeah, sounds like pilot error. Working in improper conditions etc.



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RES: RES: RES: Bare-bones Ruby Leiradella, Andre V Matos Da Cunha Ruby 0 12-29-2004 06:27 PM
Re: Macro and High res woes Dick Digital Photography 7 06-30-2003 08:04 AM
Re: Macro and High res woes Dick Digital Photography 1 06-29-2003 12:32 PM
Re: Macro and High res woes Dick Digital Photography 0 06-29-2003 06:44 AM
Re: Macro and High res woes Ed Ruf Digital Photography 0 06-28-2003 09:05 PM



Advertisments
 



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57