![]() |
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
HTML - Browser testing, FF, IE, Opera...Nestcape? |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Hi,
I use FF1.5 as my default browser, when I make changes to my pages I test them with IE, (6) and Opera, (8.5). I also use Lynx to make sure that looks ok on a text browser. While talking to a friend he suggested that I tested with Netscape as well. I think that it might be a bit of an overkill, what do you think? And if I use Netscape, maybe I should also test on older versions of the browsers, IE 5.5, FF 1.0 and so on. Where does the testing end? Simon -- http://urlkick.com/ Free URL redirection service. Turns a long URL into a much shorter one. Simon |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Simon wrote:
> I use FF1.5 as my default browser, when I make changes to my pages I test > them with IE, (6) and Opera, (8.5). I also use Lynx to make sure that looks > ok on a text browser. I think it's still worthwhile testing in IE 5.0 and 5.5. I don't expect things to look perfect in them, but it's worth making sure there are no show-stoppers. I also make sure things are working in Safari, and that there are again no show-stoppers in Opera 7, Mac IE and Konqueror 3.x, though I don't always expect *perfect* results in them. Overall I have roughly 50 browsers on my various systems; I don't test every page in every browser, but it's good to have them around when there are certain aspects of a design that you know from experience might cause problems with certain browsers. More importantly though, make sure you test at a variety of browser canvas and font sizes. -- Toby A Inkster BSc (Hons) ARCS Contact Me ~ http://tobyinkster.co.uk/contact Toby Inkster |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
To further the education of mankind, "Simon" <>
vouchsafed: > Hi, > > I use FF1.5 as my default browser, when I make changes to my pages I > test them with IE, (6) and Opera, (8.5). I also use Lynx to make sure > that looks ok on a text browser. > > While talking to a friend he suggested that I tested with Netscape as > well. > > I think that it might be a bit of an overkill, what do you think? It depends on the nature of your page. I agree with your initial method, which is what I test, myself. Netscape has a few "special" quirks that you may wish to check for, but unless your page is super-critical, meaning something like a bank page or a high-level commercial page with credit-card functions, etc., I think the "big 3" are enough. I've also quit checking older versions of any browser because IE6 is at least 6 or 7 years old, and the other main browsers never really established a large user-base on prior versions (-in regard to users likely to retain old versions when new ones are available). (-The exception is Netscape 4 or below, but that is now passe.) -- Neredbojias Infinity has its limits. Neredbojias |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Browser Close onUserExit.js | KumarHarsh | Software | 0 | 09-04-2009 12:14 PM |
| browser hijacked | me | A+ Certification | 18 | 03-02-2006 12:17 PM |
| Testing locations | Christopher Range | A+ Certification | 0 | 06-27-2005 10:28 AM |
| DVD Verdict reviews: THE PHANTOM OF THE OPERA (2004) and more! | DVD Verdict | DVD Video | 0 | 05-09-2005 09:12 AM |
| Re: How to find testing offices? | Karkucus | A+ Certification | 0 | 01-27-2004 05:21 PM |