«

klloyd wrote:
> Considering I was working from the below train wreck that's in frames,
> I didn't think I was doing too bad:
>
> http://test.springfieldparks.org/version07/home.htm

Hi Klloyd,

He didn't mean the site I don't think. Regarding this:

>>Thank you The One, this solved it. And thank you everyone who responded
>> in a civil matter. I never said I am an expert and sorry I obviously
>> chose the wrong Google Group, you're all way above me. I'm but a
>> peasant.
>
>
> Chalk up another one for 'Ingorance'! What a world we are in now!

What he meant is that this isn't a Google Group -- it's a newsgroup on
Usenet. Google Groups provides a sort of gateway through to Usenet. Much
like email is traditionally accessed through an email client, but webmail
has become popular in later years, Usenet is traditionally accessed through
special software called a newsreader, and Google Groups provides a web
interface.

When you use Google Groups, can you please make sure that you quote the
messages you are replying to? For those of us using newsreaders the context
of the message isn't always as obvious as it when using Google Groups, so it
helps us discuss the current topic a lot more effectively if you quote.
Please see the links below to find out how.

http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/
http://www.safalra.com/special/googlegroupsreply/

Thanks, and good luck with your site. This is actually an exceptionally
good place to get information on HTML, once you get used to the way it works
it is in fact one of the best places. Don't give up on it too quickly

Nik Coughlin wrote:

> What he meant is

At the risk of putting even more words into the poster's keyboard, I
took his comment not as anything about Usenet vs Google, but rather as
a criticism that The One's "fix" was bogus and an obsolete technique.

Andy Dingley <> wrote:
> Nik Coughlin wrote:
>
>> What he meant is
>
> At the risk of putting even more words into the poster's keyboard, I
> took his comment not as anything about Usenet vs Google, but rather as
> a criticism that The One's "fix" was bogus and an obsolete technique.
>
Salvation! All is not wasted!

--
Take care,

Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com

Nik Coughlin wrote:
> What he meant is that this isn't a Google Group ...

Hey thanks Nik. I'd never used a Usenet before, as if you couldn't tell
Thank you everyone for the education and the help...seriously. I
apologize to anyone who I may have frustrated, hope I didn't ruin
anybody's day! And no I won't give up on it.

Kevin