Brad Smallridge wrote:
> Am I missing something? It seems that I am spending a lot of
> time passing variables from subordinate routines to the top level
> and then back down to the next subordinate routine where what
> I really want is to send data from one subroutine to the next in
> a pipeline fashion.
If you are talking about procedure scope
in a testbench, see today's other threads.
If you are talking about synthesis code,
you can improve variable scope by
declaring all closely related variable objects
in the same clocked process.
-- Mike Treseler
|