In article <>, Telephoneman
<> writes
>
>"Brian A" <> wrote in message
>news
.. .
>> Whilst I agree that voipfone is one of the better providers you
>> shouldn't expect to get absolute reliabilty from any voip provider.
>> Certainly I wouldn't advise the giving out geo-voip phone numbers to
>> customers if a break in service is likley to affect your business
>> significantly. If you have non-geos that can readily be directed to
>> other lines in case of emergency then that would be OK. Alternatively
>> for outgoing calls it would be generally OK.
>>
Except for emergencies - no 999 service. Also you'll lose service in a
power failure unless you have a UPS; yes, I know that will also apply to
your internal network but it would be useful to retain a limited service
in such cases, just one land-line, would it not?
>Why do you feel that we shouldn't expect absolute reliability from a voip
>provider? Surely if voip is to compete in the mainstream then "five nines"
>reliability must be the aim. Or is there something inherent in the
>technology that means it can't happen? If that's the case it's hard to see
>why telcos such as BT are migrating to ip networks.
>
Could be delayed packets in an asynchronous network which doesn't matter
to data but would do for voice.
Also some of the providers mentioned in this thread are marked "Beta"
though this doesn't apply to Voipfoin.
--
Peter Pratten
Please reply in group only