«

PhilÅ wrote:
|| "Jono" <> wrote in message
|| news4JUe.106363$ .uk...
|||
|||
||| wrote:
||||| On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 21:43:57 GMT, "PhilÅ" <>
||||| wrote:
|||||
|||||
|||||| One is on a In Contact tarrif, well hidden within BT. Cost £3
|||||| PCM. Incomming calls only, no 1471 or any features.
||||| If it is well hidden how did you find it ? I would like to know
||||| more about this .
|||
||| I thought he meant the fact he had the line was well hidden - BT's
||| In Contact service prohibits any other phone lines to the house,
||| including mobiles.
|||
||
|| I moved into a house three years ago which was flats, converted, but
|| BT still has it down as flat 1 flat 2 etc...
||
|| You are right, I am not supposed to have the service as I already
|| have a other line available.
||
|| Also have a mobile.
||
|| Have had my incontact line for 6 years now.

You'll not be the only one. Customer Services could (might still be able to)
create sub-properties very easily, so long as the main address didn't owe
any money.

<> wrote in message
news
> On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 22:13:25 GMT, "SK"
> <> wrote:
>
> > sipgate are rubbish
> >
> Please tell us something that we don't know .

Ok, here is something you don't know - you are wasting your time on here.
Nobody is taking you or Stefan seriously any more.

You obviously *don't* know this, as you are still here.

Ivor

PhilÅ wrote:
|| "Jono" <> wrote in message
|| news4JUe.106363$ .uk...
|||
|||
||| wrote:
||||| On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 21:43:57 GMT, "PhilÅ" <>
||||| wrote:
|||||
|||||
|||||| One is on a In Contact tarrif, well hidden within BT. Cost £3
|||||| PCM. Incomming calls only, no 1471 or any features.
||||| If it is well hidden how did you find it ? I would like to know
||||| more about this .
|||
||| I thought he meant the fact he had the line was well hidden - BT's
||| In Contact service prohibits any other phone lines to the house,
||| including mobiles.
|||
||
|| I moved into a house three years ago which was flats, converted, but
|| BT still has it down as flat 1 flat 2 etc...
||
|| You are right, I am not supposed to have the service as I already
|| have a other line available.
||
|| Also have a mobile.
||
|| Have had my incontact line for 6 years now.

Interestingly, Ofcom's exclusions differ from my recollection:

How do they decide who is eligible for these schemes?

17. LUS is available to BT customers whose quarterly call bill is less than
£10.58. BT contacts customers who might be eligible.
InContact and Kingston's schemes are available to all customers on
application. Customers who use Indirect Access or Carrier Pre-Selection or
who make regular use of mobiles are not eligible for these schemes.

http://www.ofcom.org.uk/media/mofaq/...sofaq/?a=87101

and peopl take a bus driver seriously, eyevor dont think for one minute
people , a lot of them, they all know your connections with sipgate and many
people have said so, your bus driver story is merely a cover.

PS Why dont you accept calls from withheld numbers, are you mad or
something lovey, i bet you dont get many calls huh ?

On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 22:44:29 GMT, "Jono" <>
wrote:


>application. Customers who use Indirect Access or Carrier Pre-Selection or
>who make regular use of mobiles are not eligible for these schemes.
>
>http://www.ofcom.org.uk/media/mofaq/...sofaq/?a=87101
>
No mention about people who have an adsl connection on the line not
being eligible .

On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 22:13:25 GMT, Stefan Kaniuk said:

>sipgate are rubbish

pillock
_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

"PhilÅ" <> wrote in message
newssIUe.1852$...
>
>>
>> The 1000 option is really only of value if you can guarantee to make
>> enough calls for it to be worthwhile, otherwise it's better to stay on
>> the normal PAYG tariff.

How did you get this and does it still exist within the BT tariffs?

<> wrote in message
news:...
> On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 22:44:29 GMT, "Jono" <>
> wrote:
>
>
>>application. Customers who use Indirect Access or Carrier Pre-Selection or
>>who make regular use of mobiles are not eligible for these schemes.
>>
>>http://www.ofcom.org.uk/media/mofaq/...sofaq/?a=87101
>>
> No mention about people who have an adsl connection on the line not
> being eligible .

Have a look at the link the OP gave you to BT's site. There are many, many
more exclusions, ADSL being one of them.

On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 10:53:19 GMT, "Jono" <> wrote:

>
><> wrote in message
>news:.. .
>> On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 22:44:29 GMT, "Jono" <>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>application. Customers who use Indirect Access or Carrier Pre-Selection or
>>>who make regular use of mobiles are not eligible for these schemes.
>>>
>>>http://www.ofcom.org.uk/media/mofaq/...sofaq/?a=87101
>>>
>> No mention about people who have an adsl connection on the line not
>> being eligible .
>
>Have a look at the link the OP gave you to BT's site. There are many, many
>more exclusions, ADSL being one of them.
>
I didn't see it but it doesn't surprise me I didn't think BT would let
a semi captive customer base get away with cheaper line rental if they
only wanted adsl it isn't in BT's nature to give anything away just
the opposite in fact .

wrote:
> it isn't in BT's nature to give anything away just
> the opposite in fact .

And I'm sure that that is just how their shareholders like it. They are
a business, not a charity.