Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Computing > UK VOIP > Routers as opposed to ATAs

Reply
Thread Tools

Routers as opposed to ATAs

 
 
davew
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-20-2005
Sean wrote:
> wrote:
>
>
>> Parden me but I would think you would be much better using a modem or
>> a router I cannot see any connectors or anything on our firebricks all
>> I can see on ours are scorch marks from the flames of the fire !! .
>> Never heard of firebricks being used in connection with the internet
>> or computers in general they usually found around fireplaces .

>
>
> Think he means firewall


Or one of these:
http://www.aaisp.net.uk/aa/firebrick/
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Brian
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-20-2005
On 20.08.2005, Andrew Hodgson wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I am thinking of going with a VOIP service to use as an extra line,
> for cheaper phone calls. This is primarily for when my sister calls
> friends in the UK for longer periods, tying up the regular phone line.


Having an extra phone line cannot be a bad move. Don't forget it can
also have its own incoming number which family members can give out to
their friends.

How much cheaper outgoing calls will be is dependent on the VOIP service
chosen. Posts in this newsgroup or a Google search will allow you to
compare different offerings from various UK providers.

> There are two possible ways to do this: Get an ATA, give it an IP
> address on the LAN (using a public address). Or, I could get a router
> with VOIP capability, and it can use the IP of the router to make the
> calls. Also, I have seen some routers give automatic prioritisation
> to VOIP calls, whereas if it was on the LAN side, I would have to
> manually set this up through the firebrick.


A third way: software plus microphone and headphones.

If you already have a router I think I would go for an ATA plus a cheap
cordless phone. Having no experience of routers with Voip ports
someone else will have to advise you on whether these have any distinct
advantages over my suggestion. In particular, I do wonder how effective
the QoS capabilities are.

> Any suggestions? Am I better off sticking with BT 6p a minute option
> for evening calls that last for a lengthy period?


Estimate the capital cost of equipment, the price of UK VOIP calls and
how much is saved on renting another BT line. Factor in the importance
and convenience of a second phone line to your family.

Brian.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Dexter@blueyonder.co.uk
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-20-2005
On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 15:01:09 +0100, "Rupert"
<> wrote:

>"Sean" <> wrote::
>
>> Think he means firewall

>
>http://www.firebrick.co.uk/
>

Oh dear what is up with you lot today I did know what he was on about
I posted my remarks just to see if I could get some one saying I am
stupid or thick what is up with you lot today )))))))))))))))))).
That apart it is quite a long time since I have seen any mantion of
firebrick in any of the news groups before today .
 
Reply With Quote
 
Dexter@blueyonder.co.uk
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-20-2005
On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 14:13:57 +0000 (UTC), Brian <>
wrote:


>A third way: software plus microphone and headphones.

Yuck !!! .
>If you already have a router I think I would go for an ATA plus a cheap
>cordless phone.

Now you are talking but change the cheap for good quality I don't say
this with particular reference to VOIP most cheap cordless are crap
you need to be paying 30 or so pounds to get anything decent .
>Estimate the capital cost of equipment, the price of UK VOIP calls and
>how much is saved on renting another BT line. Factor in the importance
>and convenience of a second phone line to your family.

If cable Internet is an option no fixed phone lines are necessary at
all .
 
Reply With Quote
 
Brian
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-20-2005
On 20.08.2005, wrote:

> On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 14:13:57 +0000 (UTC), Brian <>
> wrote:
>
>>A third way: software plus microphone and headphones.

>
> Yuck !!! .


Maybe, but for someone investigating VOIP it is a relatively inexpensive
way of starting out,

>>If you already have a router I think I would go for an ATA plus a cheap
>>cordless phone.

>
> Now you are talking but change the cheap for good quality I don't say
> this with particular reference to VOIP most cheap cordless are crap
> you need to be paying 30 or so pounds to get anything decent .


30 GBP could be someone's concept of 'cheap'. On the other hand the
Binatone I bought at Argus for 18 GBP works well for me and has clear
audio.

>>Estimate the capital cost of equipment, the price of UK VOIP calls and
>>how much is saved on renting another BT line. Factor in the importance
>>and convenience of a second phone line to your family.

>
> If cable Internet is an option no fixed phone lines are necessary at
> all .


Not being familiar with cable services do I take it that a second
telephone line is provided at no cost?

Brian.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Dexter@blueyonder.co.uk
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-20-2005
On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 15:10:46 +0000 (UTC), Brian <>
wrote:


>30 GBP could be someone's concept of 'cheap'. On the other hand the
>Binatone I bought at Argus for 18 GBP works well for me and has clear
>audio.

We have the Binatone twin pack bought from Currys 28.00 a little while
ago and I agree they do work well a friend bought the 4 pack the other
week from Argos 74.00 I think he said .The BT Diverse X10 is an
exceptionally good single phone also but are a little hard to come by
now around 34.00 from "The Phone Shop" .

>Not being familiar with cable services do I take it that a second
>telephone line is provided at no cost?

Has I stated Brian with VOIP you just do not need a FIXED phone line
at all .
 
Reply With Quote
 
Brian
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-20-2005
On 20.08.2005, wrote:

> On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 15:10:46 +0000 (UTC), Brian <>
> wrote:
>
>>Not being familiar with cable services do I take it that a second
>>telephone line is provided at no cost?

>
> Has I stated Brian with VOIP you just do not need a FIXED phone line
> at all .


Yes, I understand that but I originally pointed out that one of the
considerations when taking the VOIP route is not having to acquire
another line. Now I did mention BT but could have written 'BT/cable'.
In either case the cost saving has to be balanced against expenditure on
other items.

Brian.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Ivor Jones
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-20-2005


"davew" <daviey.walker*SPAM*virgin.net> wrote in message
news:
> Sean wrote:


[snip]

> > Think he means firewall

>
> Or one of these:
> http://www.aaisp.net.uk/aa/firebrick/


Nice kit, shame about the price..!

Ivor


 
Reply With Quote
 
Ivor Jones
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-20-2005


<> wrote in message
news:
> On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 13:44:27 +0100, "Ivor Jones"
> <> wrote:
>
>
> > If by "going on" about it you mean recommending it,
> > then you're right, I do, I think it's a great piece of
> > kit. Obsession..? I wouldn't go that far.

>
> Personally I think it is a horrible looking thing now the
> Sipura 2000 is a different thing altogether a great
> looking object mind you I have always liked things that
> are straight and square . I am not all that pleased with
> the Linksys routers due to the slightly curved apperance
> they have when you look at them from the front ) .


Well I agree with you to a certain extent but at the end of the day it's
how it works that is the important thing, isn't it.

Ivor


 
Reply With Quote
 
Me
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-20-2005
>
>If you're looking for a recommendation for a specific unit, the only one I
>have personal experience of is the AVM Fritz!Box Fon which is an "all in
>one" box containing an ADSL modem, an ATA (single Ethernet port so you'd
>need a switch or hub to connect multiple computers, although it does also
>have a USB port) and two analogue phone ports.
>
>Each of the phone ports can be configured separately with different
>accounts from the same or different providers and each of the two phones
>connected can be made to ring for calls on either or both numbers. You can
>ring between them as well as a sort of mini-PBX.
>
>There is also a PSTN phone port which can be connected to either an
>ordinary analogue BT line (the phone port of the ADSL splitter) or an ISDN
>line. This will provide fallback if the VoIP system isn't working for some
>reason, or you can use it to set up dialling rules so that calls to
>mobiles or 0870 numbers go via BT, as a lot of VoIP providers charge more
>than BT for calls to these numbers.
>
>It does have QoS to give priority to VoIP calls as well, which needs no
>setting up.
>
>More info at www.avm.de/en if you want to have a look
>


Personally, I think you cannot go wrong with the Speedtouch 716 WL

http://www.speedtouch.co.uk/prod716WL.asp?menuCurrPos=2.

It is a modem / router/ wireless with 2 VOIP ports - so you just plug
in an ordinary phone put in the name of your VOIP provider and your
username and password and you are away. It also has QOS of required.

It costs around £90

Me
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ATAs and REN Mark UK VOIP 5 07-22-2005 10:23 AM
Where should a purchase Sipura ATAs? Ramon F Herrera VOIP 4 07-08-2005 07:00 AM
Voiptalk newsletter - Grandstream ATAs for £35 Zebeddee VOIP 1 05-04-2005 02:32 AM
Looking for ATA186US.EXE. Just bought ATAs-186 - turned to be 2.15ms image. Konrad Starek VOIP 2 12-03-2003 02:38 AM
To make two ATAs 186 talk each other What is needed? Juan G. Castaneda VOIP 1 07-13-2003 05:06 PM



Advertisments
 



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57