Go Back   Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > VHDL
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply

VHDL - Onchip SRAM Vs Registers

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-25-2005, 03:39 PM   #1
Default Onchip SRAM Vs Registers


Hi all,
Can anyone tell me what is the threshold point(memory size) to opt
for Onchip SRAM instead of FlipFlops , considering the Power&Area. In a
module I have ~5Kbit of memory implemented as verilog registers. I
would like to know the Power/Area savings if I switch to SRAM instead
of Flipflops. I use .13u process.
Any links/documents in this regard are highly welcome.
Thanks
Deepu John



john.deepu@gmail.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2005, 03:58 PM   #2
Peter Alfke
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Onchip SRAM Vs Registers
John, your question seems to relate to ASIC design. This newsgroup
deals with FPGAs where you select and then use a given architecture.
That means the trade-offs are different.
Modern FPGAs have SRAM blocks of various sizes, from 512 bits to 18 k
bits and even larger. Xilinx offers the RAM option in the Look-up
Tables (LUTs), which can even be used as shift registers.
The designer's decision is to use available resources, not to design
latches or flip-flops.
This can lead to peculiar design optimizations when a certain resource
is abundant and not all used, e.g. BlockRAMs.
5k bit fits very comfortably in one 18 kbit dual-ported BlockRAM, but
would take an inordinate amount of LUTs, even at 16 bits per LUT. You
decide.
Peter Alfke, Xilinx



Peter Alfke
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Adding two registers A and B in vhdl Haai Hardware 0 08-18-2007 04:56 PM




SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46