«

What is wrong with this? Both are variables and
row_counter gets advanced in another process.

wait until( row_counter = start_recording_row_delay );

b r a d @ a i v i s i o n . c o m

"Brad Smallridge" <> wrote in message
news:...
> What is wrong with this? Both are variables and
> row_counter gets advanced in another process.
>
> wait until( row_counter = start_recording_row_delay );
>
> b r a d @ a i v i s i o n . c o m
If they are both variables then there is nothing to trigger the wait
statement. At least one of them must be a signal. (Variables have no
event information associated with them. The wait needs an event to
trigger its execution.)

Charles Bailey

Brad Smallridge wrote:

> What is wrong with this? Both are variables and
> row_counter gets advanced in another process.
>
> wait until( row_counter = start_recording_row_delay );
>
> b r a d @ a i v i s i o n . c o m
>
>
Brad,

I don't understand.
If both are variables (not global) then you cannot see them from other processes !
And if they are local to the process where the wait is located, who will update them
if the process is suspended ???
Maybe you meant that row_counter was a signal ? (then it should work)

Or maybe you've declared "variable row_counter" in both processes ?

Bert