Go Back   Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > VHDL
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply

VHDL - Flex model concept?

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-08-2003, 04:35 PM   #1
Default Flex model concept?


I am trying to understand the VHDL structure behind one of the Synopsys flex
models:
(http://www.synopsys.com/products/des...e1394a_fx.pdf).
I don't have access to the model itself, only to this datasheet... There is
a VHDL testbench example in this datasheet that shows how the model is
instantiated. Can someone please explain how they did the command interface?
Are these commands (shown in red in the testbench example) VHDL procedures?
If they are how do they communicate to the model? I guess it happens somehow
through a handle, but how do you do it in VHDL? I am intrigued by this
concept...

Thanks,
/Mikhail





MM
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2003, 07:12 PM   #2
Mike Treseler
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Flex model concept?
MM wrote:

> Are these commands (shown in red in the testbench example) VHDL procedures?


pg 50
http://www.synopsys.com/products/des...als/flexum.pdf

-- Mike Treseler



Mike Treseler
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2003, 08:29 PM   #3
MM
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Flex model concept?

"Mike Treseler" <> wrote in message
news:...
> MM wrote:
>
> > Are these commands (shown in red in the testbench example) VHDL

procedures?
>
> pg 50
>

http://www.synopsys.com/products/des...als/flexum.pdf
>


OK, I see. It seems that the thing is pretty complicated and involves much
more than just VHDL language, requires a simulator with SWIFT interface,
etc. Is the whole point of this to hide the model implementation in a binary
or are there other reasons? Assuming I wanted to do a functionally similar
thing, I guess I could simply add a command control port to the model entity
and have it controlled by external procedures the way I wanted. Is there a
downside to this approach compared to what Synopsys offers (besides hiding
the implementation)?

/Mikhail





MM
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2003, 08:37 PM   #4
Mike Treseler
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Flex model concept?
MM wrote:
> etc. Is the whole point of this to hide the model implementation in a binary
> or are there other reasons?


That would be my guess.

> Assuming I wanted to do a functionally similar
> thing, I guess I could simply add a command control port to the model entity
> and have it controlled by external procedures the way I wanted.


Yes, keep it simple; have it your way.

> Is there a
> downside to this approach compared to what Synopsys offers (besides hiding
> the implementation)?


Unless you already own and must use this model,
there is no reason to study this odd interface.

-- Mike Treseler



Mike Treseler
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2003, 09:20 PM   #5
MM
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Flex model concept?
Thanks, Mike. I feel more confident now...

/Mikhail




MM
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rental Subscription Model Fails To Spread Black Locust DVD Video 0 09-18-2005 09:13 AM
Toshiba RD XS34 model (UK) - DVD dub paul@paullee.com DVD Video 2 08-23-2005 11:40 PM
Can't find Motherboard model on PCB! A+ Certification 5 08-06-2004 07:33 AM
JVC Camcorder Errors "REMOVE AND REATTACH BATTERY" or "UNIT IN SAFEGUARD MODE" or E04 Juan Carrera DVD Video 0 06-22-2004 05:34 AM
Netflix Business Model Patented. Scot Gardner DVD Video 2 09-22-2003 01:24 PM




SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46