![]() |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
I am trying to understand the VHDL structure behind one of the Synopsys flex
models: (http://www.synopsys.com/products/des...e1394a_fx.pdf). I don't have access to the model itself, only to this datasheet... There is a VHDL testbench example in this datasheet that shows how the model is instantiated. Can someone please explain how they did the command interface? Are these commands (shown in red in the testbench example) VHDL procedures? If they are how do they communicate to the model? I guess it happens somehow through a handle, but how do you do it in VHDL? I am intrigued by this concept... Thanks, /Mikhail MM |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
MM wrote:
> Are these commands (shown in red in the testbench example) VHDL procedures? pg 50 http://www.synopsys.com/products/des...als/flexum.pdf -- Mike Treseler Mike Treseler |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
"Mike Treseler" <> wrote in message news:... > MM wrote: > > > Are these commands (shown in red in the testbench example) VHDL procedures? > > pg 50 > http://www.synopsys.com/products/des...als/flexum.pdf > OK, I see. It seems that the thing is pretty complicated and involves much more than just VHDL language, requires a simulator with SWIFT interface, etc. Is the whole point of this to hide the model implementation in a binary or are there other reasons? Assuming I wanted to do a functionally similar thing, I guess I could simply add a command control port to the model entity and have it controlled by external procedures the way I wanted. Is there a downside to this approach compared to what Synopsys offers (besides hiding the implementation)? /Mikhail MM |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
MM wrote:
> etc. Is the whole point of this to hide the model implementation in a binary > or are there other reasons? That would be my guess. > Assuming I wanted to do a functionally similar > thing, I guess I could simply add a command control port to the model entity > and have it controlled by external procedures the way I wanted. Yes, keep it simple; have it your way. > Is there a > downside to this approach compared to what Synopsys offers (besides hiding > the implementation)? Unless you already own and must use this model, there is no reason to study this odd interface. -- Mike Treseler Mike Treseler |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks, Mike. I feel more confident now...
/Mikhail MM |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Rental Subscription Model Fails To Spread | Black Locust | DVD Video | 0 | 09-18-2005 09:13 AM |
| Toshiba RD XS34 model (UK) - DVD dub | paul@paullee.com | DVD Video | 2 | 08-23-2005 11:40 PM |
| Can't find Motherboard model on PCB! | A+ Certification | 5 | 08-06-2004 07:33 AM | |
| JVC Camcorder Errors "REMOVE AND REATTACH BATTERY" or "UNIT IN SAFEGUARD MODE" or E04 | Juan Carrera | DVD Video | 0 | 06-22-2004 05:34 AM |
| Netflix Business Model Patented. | Scot Gardner | DVD Video | 2 | 09-22-2003 01:24 PM |