On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 08:56:30 -0800, "Toolman Tim"
<> wrote:
>
>"lugnut" <> wrote in message
>news:.. .
>| On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 07:24:50 -0700, "Dick M."
>| <> wrote:
>|
>| >I have a Gateway G6-233 that I purchased in 1997.
>| >I have heard that something restricts the ability of
>| >that computer to use large hard drives. I have
>| >changed the CPU to a Celeron 500 and added
>| >more memory. I need a larger hard drive now.
>| >What is the limitation factor? Is there a particular
>| >type of drive I need to function properly in this old
>| >computer?
>| >Thanks,
>| >Dick
>| >
>| >
>|
>| I just junked a similar machine because of upgrade
>| limitations. IIRC, the max the BIOS in it could recognize
>| was 8GB - yours may be different. You can of course use a
>| drive manager that comes with most new drives but, this
>| usually comes at a performance cost.
>
>Just how much of a "performance cost" can there be in patching a few bytes
>in the BIOS when the hard drive boots? It only happens once when the maching
>is started.
>
In newer machines, you will probably never notice it but,
then you won't likely need the manager either. My
experience using a disk manager was last in a 486 machine
where it was apparent in slowing the machine. I have no
idea that he would actually see a noticeable performance
hit. He may even more than make up for any performance hit
because the current drives are so much faster anyway. I
guess my response was from a cost/benefit perspective since
I can't see the time and expense of putting a new drive into
a machine like his when it can be completely replaced with a
much more capable machine including the larger hard drive so
cheaply here in the Atlanta, GA area for not that much more
cost than a decent drive. The machine I had similar to his
was junked a couple of months back after I couldn't even
find a charity that would take it. That may not be the case
in other countries.
|