"Rôgêr" <> wrote in message
news:95udnW4d_v-dVBbcRVn-...
> r_mervart wrote:
>
> > "Rôgêr" <> wrote in message
> > news
tidnXiCwvvuEBbcRVn-...
> >
> >>Robert11 wrote:
> >>
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>Will be updating my very old W98 OS to W98 SE so I can run
> >>>some programs that apparently require SE.
> >>>
> >>>See that there are disks, and downloads, that are either termed as
> >
> > "Upgrade"
> >
> >>>or "Update" to SE
> >>>
> >>>What are the differences ?
> >>>
> >>>Which do I want ? Why ?
> >>>
> >>>I sure don't want to wipe out anything, or cause other problems, on my
> >
> > HD
> >
> >>>when I do this.
> >>>
> >>>Would like to do the absolute minimum I have to in order to run some of
> >>>these programs.
> >>>
> >>>Which do I want ?
> >>
> >>There isn't two different ways of doing it, just the the "upgrade". And
> >> you don't need to do anything but pop in the disk and be ready to type
> >>in the product key, and hit Enter about a dozen times. You won't lose
> >>anything unless things go terribly wrong, but then that's why you have
> >>that set of backup disks of your important data.
> >
> >
> > ... but to "upgrade" from Win 98 you use CD labelled as
> > Win98 Second Edition Updates.
>
> Uh, no, mine is labled Upgrade. And like all the other upgrades that MS
> have published it is the full version with only a slightly different
> install routine. It can be used either as full install or upgrade.
What exactly does it say in full on your CD? I think one needs to be quite
precise here. There may be other way but I know that I went through the
process
of upgrading and updating as I described in the other posting. Once I had
Win 98 installed (upgraded from Win95) I used Win98 Second Edition Updates
CD to update Win98 to Win98 SE.
roman