On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 00:42:28 GMT, in
<Ut1Gc.5574$. net>
Retiredff scrawled:
>
>
>°Mike° wrote:
>> On Sun, 04 Jul 2004 17:03:35 -0700, in
>> <>
>> ZZ scrawled:
>>
>>> On Sun, 04 Jul 2004 23:24:22 +0100, °Mike° <>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Bullshit. Mozilla leaves traces, if you are that paranoid,
>>>> just as any application does -- it's all there on your
>>>> hard drive for forensics to find.
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>> It may leave traces, but at least the history file IS EMPTIED
>>> when you ask mozilla to do so, unlike IE.
>>
>> The IE history is emptied when you ask it to. If yours
>> does not, then you have a separate problem.
>
>But the index.dat history file does not. So, your IE history file
>is, but it isn't.
>
>Correct?
As I said, "if you are that paranoid". The index.dat file is
unreadable by the casual user, and gets overwritten as
your browsing progresses, and the temporary internet
files and history are cleaned, sites visited again, etc.
The only people who complain about this issue are those
that have something to hide, or those unfortunate enough
and gullible enough to believe the scaremongering about so
called "super hidden files".
It is a non-issue for the majority of surfers, but seems to
be a major issue for those who are terrified that somebody
might actually find out what they have been viewing, or
for those who take every opportunity to slam *any* Microsoft
product -- I have no love for Microsoft products, generally,
but I find this "index.dat" issue to be quite laughable.
--
Basic computer maintenance
http://uk.geocities.com/personel44/maintenance.html