Once upon a time, OK, it really happened on Mon, 31 May 2004 14:06:14
-0700, "Toolman Tim" <TCMayer_at_charter_net_invalid> claimed the
following truncated trash was the absolute, ****ing truth:
>Yes, Celerons are great. But they are not P4's downgraded because of not
>passing tests. They are a different CPU, with limited cache memory. We use
>Celerons at work on all but the CAD workstations, since they do great with
>MS Office type products. IMO, for graphics intensive applications, the P4 is
>going to perform enough better to pay for itself.
Celerons are nothing but P4s with 128 kb of cache. They have the exact
same core.
Dr Harvie Wahl-Banghor
>"Kenny" <> wrote in message
>news: ws.com...
>> what kind of trash are you telling people to do you moron!
>> Celerons are great.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> www.computerboom.net
>> "Hamman" <****> wrote in message
>> news:...
>> >
>> > "steven" <> wrote in message
>> > news:40ba8d19$...
>> > > i am told by someone that a celeron with a speed of 1.7 Ghz is
>actually
>> > lowe
>> > > in speed than a pentium 4 label as having a speed of 1.7 Ghz. Is it
>true
>> > and
>> > > if so by how much? Any reply would be greatly appreciated. Thanx a
>lot.
>> > >
>> > > Steven
>> > >
>> > >
>> > Dont touch a celeron (or duron for that matter) with a 10ft clown pole.
>> > Especially when you can get a full AthlonXP for the same price as a
>Celly.
>> >
>> > hamman
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> ---
>> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
>> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>> Version: 6.0.692 / Virus Database: 453 - Release Date: 28/5/2004
>>
>>
>
---
"I think you need to get bent, asshole. Bend over and let me shove a
vibrating dildo up your ass and give you a blow job. You need to learn
how to shut up, assballs"
Zittmutter offers McDougal some oral carnal knowledge in Message-ID: <>