On Mon, 29 Dec 2003 07:04:16 GMT, BreastLover wrote:
>Is there a particular reason that you would recommend Outpost over
>Zonealarm?
Although I was fairly happy with ZA (free) and later ZAP , it had some
service hang issues and was hard to clear out all registry settings and
data files to reload it.
My ZAP 1 year renew expired a few months ago and I stopped using it long
before that.
After many threads on the subject in 24HSHD I went with the Outpost
route. I prefer the log file viewer, the rules for active content blocks
part of the plugins. As well as the global settings, ICMP options and
switch between stealth / normal mode.
Another factor was the cost, a 5 PC family pack was cheaper than the 2/3
other packages just about to expire after 1 year free.
>----------------------------------------------------------
>"Boomer" <Boomer__Baby_@mailinator.com> wrote in message
>news:3fefae75$0$5082$ reenews.net...
>> "TRADESMAN" <> wrote in
>> news:bsoagq$eq87m$:
>>
>> > Over Christmas I got a notice from ZA, that an updated version was
>> > available. When I installed it, it came with something called
>> > ZAclient. I then noticed that this was making an outgoing internet
>> > connection every 10 minutes or so. After I disabled it, I got a
>> > warning message that ZA would no longer be able to check for
>> > updates automatically. Surely there's no way on this Earth that
<snip>
Me
|