web page testers wanted

10-08-2003

http://1-large-world.com/testing/

need to know from vairous users how the page loads for you.
Does the rollover image swap work in your browser?
Do the images swap immediately or do they "load" again?
I'm on cable so I don't know what dialup response is like.

Thanks to all who reply.

<flame retardant suit on>

10-08-2003

You need to supply the full URL.
Your link is a directory path.

On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 12:51:49 -0500, "Richard" <anom@anom> wrote:

>http://1-large-world.com/testing/
>
>need to know from vairous users how the page loads for you.
>Does the rollover image swap work in your browser?
>Do the images swap immediately or do they "load" again?
>I'm on cable so I don't know what dialup response is like.
>
>Thanks to all who reply.
>
><flame retardant suit on>
>

10-08-2003

Harrison said:

> You need to supply the full URL.
> Your link is a directory path.

*NEVER* trust an unfamiliar link given by Richard Bullis.

>
> On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 12:51:49 -0500, "Richard" <anom@anom> wrote:
>
>> http://****offbullis.com/testing/
>>
>> need to know from vairous users how the page loads for you.
>> Does the rollover image swap work in your browser?
>> Do the images swap immediately or do they "load" again?
>> I'm on cable so I don't know what dialup response is like.
>>
>> Thanks to all who reply.
>>
>> <flame retardant suit on>

10-08-2003

Hey Richard,
I got ISDN and it works fine for me.
The page load a bit long, 30sec. but when the page was in, everything worked
well.
Images displayed instand when hover over the links, so i guess you did a
good job

Jack

"Richard" <anom@anom> schreef in bericht
news:...
> http://1-large-world.com/testing/
>
> need to know from vairous users how the page loads for you.
> Does the rollover image swap work in your browser?
> Do the images swap immediately or do they "load" again?
> I'm on cable so I don't know what dialup response is like.
>
> Thanks to all who reply.
>
> <flame retardant suit on>
>
>

10-08-2003

I was curious as to which trojan it would attempt to load.

On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 19:51:12 +0100, "Brian H¹©" <>
wrote:

>Harrison said:
>
>> You need to supply the full URL.
>> Your link is a directory path.
>
>*NEVER* trust an unfamiliar link given by Richard Bullis.
>
>>
>> On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 12:51:49 -0500, "Richard" <anom@anom> wrote:
>>
>>> http://****offbullis.com/testing/
>>>
>>> need to know from vairous users how the page loads for you.
>>> Does the rollover image swap work in your browser?
>>> Do the images swap immediately or do they "load" again?
>>> I'm on cable so I don't know what dialup response is like.
>>>
>>> Thanks to all who reply.
>>>
>>> <flame retardant suit on>
>
>

10-08-2003

Harrison said:

> I was curious as to which trojan it would attempt to load.

You never know what pics could be loading to your cache.

>
> On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 19:51:12 +0100, "Brian H¹©" <>
> wrote:
>
>> Harrison said:
>>
>>> You need to supply the full URL.
>>> Your link is a directory path.
>>
>> *NEVER* trust an unfamiliar link given by Richard Bullis.
>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 12:51:49 -0500, "Richard" <anom@anom> wrote:
>>>
>>>> http://****offbullis.com/testing/
>>>>
>>>> need to know from vairous users how the page loads for you.
>>>> Does the rollover image swap work in your browser?
>>>> Do the images swap immediately or do they "load" again?
>>>> I'm on cable so I don't know what dialup response is like.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks to all who reply.
>>>>
>>>> <flame retardant suit on>

10-08-2003

On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 12:51:49 -0500, Richard wrote:

>http://1-large-world.com/testing/

Slow to load, ARGH!!!! the tiny little graphics come to a horrible
180KB, you are taking 2 by 400x400 and a 200x150 image and forcing them
to be displayed in a tiny 20x20 box.

Please create thumbnails, even if 20x20 is too small try 32x32. cast3
can be reduced to a bmp/gif/jpg of 1.2K or less.

You have this, fine.
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">

You don't have, character encoding labeling, something like
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
hence it can't be validated
http://validator.w3.org/
automatically as per the DOCTYPE line.

Trying the extended options
http://validator.w3.org/detailed.html
getting timeouts connecting, possibly due to the large page size?

Using the file upload, i.e. a copy I saved locally and (MSIE alters
files when saved, but does not affect the results in this case).

File: [No title].htm
Encoding: windows-1252
Doctype: HTML 4.0 Transitional
Errors: 5
This page is not Valid HTML 4.0 Transitional!

Below are the results of attempting to parse this document with an SGML
parser.

Line 17, column 62: required attribute "ALT" not specified (explain...).
...IMG height=20 src="[No title]_files/cast3.jpg" width=20> <IMG
height=20
^
Line 18, column 43: required attribute "ALT" not specified (explain...).
src="[No title]_files/asgard2.jpg" width=20> <IMG height=20
^
Line 19, column 44: required attribute "ALT" not specified (explain...).
src="[No title]_files/unas-001.jpg" width=20>
^
Line 29, column 57: there is no attribute "NAME" (explain...).
<DIV class=one><IMG src="[No title]_files/dhd2.gif" name=main>
^
Line 29, column 61: required attribute "ALT" not specified (explain...).
...class=one><IMG src="[No title]_files/dhd2.gif" name=main>

The mouse over works, in
Opera 7.10 / 6.05 (in 6.05 it shows unas streched, must be a setting
somewhere)

NS 4.72 except for CSS positioning it's okay, same issue in unas as
Opera 6.

MSIE 6 SP1 and patches / 5.5 SP2 and patches

Mozilla v 1.5 RC2 / v1.4

In the CSS

..one { position:absolute;
left:50mm; top:10mm;

failed CSS validation
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/
because of the missing closing }

Page title, should not be '<TITLE>[No title]</TITLE>' needs changed at
some point

In the CSS 'position:absolute;' could cause problems with some UA's
(user agents, web browser, pda, printer) you can't be sure just how big
the browser area, paper, handheld screen will be for the position sizes
you are setting. It's (I think) better to use relative % values rather
than fixed measurement 'mm' anyway.

Not so sure what to do for that.

You can also get help / checks in these groups.

alt.html
alt.html.critique

Me

10-08-2003

X-No-Archive: Yes
On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 14:29:33 -0400, Harrison wrote:

>You need to supply the full URL.

Nope, the server sends the default configured file, does not matter if
it's default/index or any extension .htm .html and so on.

>Your link is a directory path.
It is.

Try SamSpade,

10/08/03 20:18:42 Browsing http://1-large-world.com/testing/
Fetching http://1-large-world.com/testing/ ...
GET /testing/ HTTP/1.1
Host: 1-large-world.com
Connection: close
User-Agent: Sam Spade 1.14
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 19:18:40 GMT

>On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 12:51:49 -0500, "Richard" <anom@anom> wrote:
>
>>http://1-large-world.com/testing/
>>
>>need to know from vairous users how the page loads for you.
>>Does the rollover image swap work in your browser?
<snip>

Me

10-08-2003

On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 12:51:49 -0500, Richard wrote:

>http://1-large-world.com/testing/
>
Forgot one, in the CSS it could use comments to hide it from older
browsers.

<style type="text/css">

</style>

Me

10-08-2003

I got nothing on DSL and gave up.
WebWasher could be blocking scripts.

On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 19:21:10 GMT, why?
<fgrirp*sgc@VAINY!Qznq.fpvragvfg.pbz> wrote:

>X-No-Archive: Yes
>On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 14:29:33 -0400, Harrison wrote:
>
>>You need to supply the full URL.
>
>Nope, the server sends the default configured file, does not matter if
>it's default/index or any extension .htm .html and so on.
>
>>Your link is a directory path.
>It is.
>
>Try SamSpade,
>
>10/08/03 20:18:42 Browsing http://1-large-world.com/testing/
>Fetching http://1-large-world.com/testing/ ...
>GET /testing/ HTTP/1.1
>Host: 1-large-world.com
>Connection: close
>User-Agent: Sam Spade 1.14
>HTTP/1.1 200 OK
>Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 19:18:40 GMT
>
>>On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 12:51:49 -0500, "Richard" <anom@anom> wrote:
>>
>>>http://1-large-world.com/testing/
>>>
>>>need to know from vairous users how the page loads for you.
>>>Does the rollover image swap work in your browser?
><snip>
>
>Me

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Re: Testers wanted for new page view analysis tool	Travis Newbury	HTML	11	01-16-2009 05:28 PM
Re: Testers wanted for new page view analysis tool	Adrian	HTML	1	01-12-2009 12:07 PM
HELP WANTED HELP WANTED HELP WANTED	Harvey	ASP .Net	1	07-16-2004 01:12 PM
HELP WANTED HELP WANTED HELP WANTED	Harvey	ASP .Net	0	07-16-2004 10:00 AM
Product to automatically convert VB.Net projects to C# - Beta Testers wanted	Roger Jack	ASP .Net	0	12-04-2003 06:05 PM