«

On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 15:21:26 -0700, in
<bl52h7$8028a$>
trout scrawled:

>Me-GT wrote:
>
>> I'm tired of this lurker.
>> What an abject cretin.
>> Always asking cretinous questions instead of being sympathetic to
>> posters, who patently don't know what level to aim the question at...
>> Go take the **** out of your family instead of targeting us new to
>> computing, PLEASE...
>>
>> Michael
>
> Yes, let's hope that the knowledgable person who helps hundreds of
>people toddles off, because *you're* too thick to understand what he's
>saying, and why. To someone else.
> After all, why ask those burdonsome questions in order to provide
>the *correct* answer, when he could just sit down and write-up a list of
>possibilities, based on all possible scenerios and guesswork?
> That way, thick-headed ignorant twits like you could pick the one
>that strikes their fancy, and it would magically correct all their
>difficulties; without having to apply the slightest amount of thought to
>their own problem, or even bother fully describing it.
> Are you a complete and utter moron; or are you participating in a
>contest for the most bizarrely misinformed, stupid, and ridiculous post?

I guess I must have a hidden "kick me" sign hidden about
my (virtual) person, today.

--
"Weekend posters can be irritating, kind of like tourists can."

On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 21:06:32 +0100, Me-GT wrote:

>I'm tired of this lurker.
>What an abject cretin.
>Always asking cretinous questions instead of being sympathetic to posters,
>who patently don't know what level to aim the question at...
>Go take the **** out of your family instead of targeting us new to
>computing, PLEASE...

PLEASE, shut the **** up.

"Why don't you just put a neon sign on your forehead that flashes "I'm STOOPID"
instead? It will have the same effect as your whine."

--
If it adjusts their attitude towards the desired goal, then it's a LART,
even if it doesn't leave blood stains." -- Paul Tomblin

This is the Flibbydabby Dee Service of the BBC, & on Sat, 27 Sep 2003
17:57:51 -0500, Mara uttered this:

> On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 21:06:32 +0100, Me-GT wrote:
>
>>I'm tired of this lurker.
>>What an abject cretin.
>>Always asking cretinous questions instead of being sympathetic to posters,
>>who patently don't know what level to aim the question at...
>>Go take the **** out of your family instead of targeting us new to
>>computing, PLEASE...
>
> PLEASE, shut the **** up.
>
> "Why don't you just put a neon sign on your forehead that flashes "I'm STOOPID"
> instead? It will have the same effect as your whine."

Probably because, he too st00pid to know he's st00pid?

--
"I can almost hear the
shutters going up on him"

This is the Flibbydabby Dee Service of the BBC, & on Sat, 27 Sep 2003
21:25:25 +0100, °Mike° uttered this:

> Lurker? Cretin? I guess that sums *you* up pretty well.

<quote>
>I'm tired of this lurker.
>What an abject cretin.
<quote>

That sums him up *very* well, I'd say...


> On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 21:06:32 +0100, in
> <bl4qhm$p1j$>
> Me-GT scrawled:

<nothing to see>

On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 00:25:09 +0100, in
<>
William Poaster scrawled:

>This is the Flibbydabby Dee Service of the BBC, & on Sat, 27 Sep 2003
>21:25:25 +0100, °Mike° uttered this:
>
>> Lurker? Cretin? I guess that sums *you* up pretty well.
>
><quote>
>>I'm tired of this lurker.
>>What an abject cretin.
><quote>
>
>That sums him up *very* well, I'd say...

I particularly liked the "lurker" reference. Choice!

>> On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 21:06:32 +0100, in
>> <bl4qhm$p1j$>
>> Me-GT scrawled:
>
><nothing to see>

--
Basic computer maintenance
http://uk.geocities.com/personel44/maintenance.html

Mara Spilled my beer when they jumped on the table and proclaimed in
<>:
> PLEASE, shut the **** up.
>
> "Why don't you just put a neon sign on your forehead that flashes
> "I'm STOOPID" instead? It will have the same effect as your whine."

Actually, that tile's been taken. However, I put forth the motion
to assign the new title of "I'm a friggin ****-stirring,
bottom-feeding sack of snail snot" to that particular poster...

All in favor?

--
"Aye"

°Mike° Spilled my beer when they jumped on the table and proclaimed
in <>:
> I guess I must have a hidden "kick me" sign hidden about
> my (virtual) person, today.
>

They don't like your advice? IMO, they're more than welcome to
muddle around on their own...**** em.

NOI

--
"Carry on"

On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 22:18:04 -0400, in
<3f764400$0$13094$>
Thund3rstruck scrawled:

>°Mike° Spilled my beer when they jumped on the table and proclaimed
>in <>:
>> I guess I must have a hidden "kick me" sign hidden about
>> my (virtual) person, today.
>>
>
> They don't like your advice? IMO, they're more than welcome to
>muddle around on their own...**** em.
>
> NOI

What is striking, is that those who attempt to bad mouth others, more
often than not, never offer alternative advice of their own. Quite
telling, don't you think?

--
"Just one classic sign of a troll."

°Mike° wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 00:25:09 +0100, in
> <>
> William Poaster scrawled:
>
>> This is the Flibbydabby Dee Service of the BBC, & on Sat, 27 Sep 2003
>> 21:25:25 +0100, °Mike° uttered this:
>>
>>> Lurker? Cretin? I guess that sums *you* up pretty well.
>>
>> <quote>
>>> I'm tired of this lurker.
>>> What an abject cretin.
>> <quote>
>>
>> That sums him up *very* well, I'd say...
>
> I particularly liked the "lurker" reference. Choice!
>
>>> On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 21:06:32 +0100, in
>>> <bl4qhm$p1j$>
>>> Me-GT scrawled:
>>
>> <nothing to see>

Dammit Mike, I told you to lurk in SECRET, but no, you just had to post
helpful stuff while you lurked....

--
"Chaos, panic and disorder ... my work here
is done."

On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 02:33:05 GMT, in
<BLrdb.3959$>
"Sir_Grizzly" <Sir > scrawled:

>
>
>°Mike° wrote:
>> On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 00:25:09 +0100, in
>> <>
>> William Poaster scrawled:
>>
>>> This is the Flibbydabby Dee Service of the BBC, & on Sat, 27 Sep 2003
>>> 21:25:25 +0100, °Mike° uttered this:
>>>
>>>> Lurker? Cretin? I guess that sums *you* up pretty well.
>>>
>>> <quote>
>>>> I'm tired of this lurker.
>>>> What an abject cretin.
>>> <quote>
>>>
>>> That sums him up *very* well, I'd say...
>>
>> I particularly liked the "lurker" reference. Choice!
>>
<snip>
>
>Dammit Mike, I told you to lurk in SECRET, but no, you just had to post
>helpful stuff while you lurked....

You mean all this time, I actually WAS pressing "Send"?

--
"OMFG!"