On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 12:09:16 -0500
wrote:
> >"PocoMail Portable Edition (PocoMail PE for short) allows you to have the full
> >power of PocoMail at your disposal wherever you go. Imagine having access to
> >your email at home and at the office at all times, while keeping it private at
> >the same time. This is the new concept introduced by PocoMail PE.
> >Do away with limited space, security and features of webmail and use the only
> >desktop client that fits in your pocket."
> >
> >http://www.pocomailpe.com/
>
> Interesting!
>
> I will check it out but in the meantime.... how is it
> "portable"?
>
> Do you carry it on a floppy or USB key? Is that what
> they mean abt it being portable and easy to access
> email form either home or work? Or is there some other
> method of doing that they use?
Yes. Check out the web site, particularly this page:
http://www.pocomailpe.com/media.html
I was using a Zip disk for a while. ATM I'm using it locally only, but I bought
PE so I had the option of going mobile again.
>
> Also..... I notice you use Agent for news, right?
>
> So Im taking it that you use SEPARATE apps for email
> and news? Use Agent for news and Poco PE for mail?
It starts to get a little complex when you ask what i'm using for what.
Mostly I'm using Eudora as my main email program. It's a bit old and creaky
(4.something) but the later versions don't really seem to have any extra
features that I feel are worth paying for. Especially not on a budget.
I'm using Agent for newsreading. I used to use it as my main email proggy, too,
but I've got more email addresses now than a stray dog has fleas. Agent 1.x
doesn't handle multiple addresses cleanly. I'm hoping 2.x will (it's supposed
to). Agent 1.x doesn't render HTML (so is totally immune to HTML stuff), is
great at threading email lists, and is pretty easy to use, but I need the
multiple accounts. So right now I'm just using it for newsgroups only, and just
my newsgroup email address.
In my search for the "perfect" Windows email app I encountered Pocomail. It
seemed the best combination of features, given that "threading" was a
requirement (otherwise I could just stick with Eudora, eh?) So I'm using
Pocomail for my email lists. On a separate email account, of course.
Actually, I can use a separate Agent configuration to do that. Running two
copies of Agent is no more difficult than running one Agent and one Pocomail. If
Pocomail had been just a bit better I'd have bought it and used it to replace
Eudora altogether, but being on a budget, I decided not to.
However, I needed something for my daughter that wasn't OE but was just as easy
to use. Eudora and Agent didn't seem to fill the bill, so I set her up to try
Pocomail, and she liked it, so I bought it. Since I bought it anyway, I starting
using it myself.
There, aren't you sorry you asked?
(BTW: to export email from Agent to Pocomail isn't difficult. Takes a few steps,
though.)
>
> If yes..... do you find the "separating" of functions
> into two apps like that to be the best way to go
> overall?
I'd have to say it's ENTIRELY up to your needs and how crazy you want to get.
This just sort of evolved over several years. However, if you need multiple
addresses, and need to do newsgroups, and you're using Agent as your newsreader,
since Agent can't (yet) do multiple email addresses without playing around (have
to run separate copies with different configuration files, one per address), I'd
say you'd want a separate email app for your non-newsgroup email. That is, of
course, very much my own humble opinion, but to me it just makes sense.
My wife is still using Agent for everything, but ATM she only has one email
address. She's getting spam, of course. For now she's tolerating it, and we're
running her nonken.net email through a spare email box on our ISP, which has
Brightmail, and I've added those SWEN/GIBE filters that I've been pushing here
to nonken.net

, so for now I guess it's tolerable. Once Agent 2.x comes out I
expect we'll be expanding her horizons. Not to mention her number of email
boxes.
> Im a LONG time user of Agent..... but have always used
> it for BOTH news and mail. Now Im seriously
> considering using a sep app for email only.....and use
> Agent for news only
>
> Good idea in your opinion?
I'm using it for both, but like I said, I'm using Agent only for my throw-away
spam-catcher newsgroup email account. I find it convenient to have them together
in a single context. The only problem with that is that I can't use a munged
domain address in my configuration if I want to also send email; the way
everything interacts, it doesn't authenticate. So I have to use my real address
or keep changing it back and forth in the configuration, a real pain. So I use a
throw-away address and don't worry about it; since I own the domain and control
the host, I can make as many email addresses as I want.
Anyway, you have to use what works for you, but maybe that'll give you food for
thought.
Excelsior!
---
If brains were dynamite, I couldn't blow my nose.