«

I have started to use zone alarm again, I used it before and I used a
program that run with it, which showed all the details of the attack attmept
and you could trace it and such..I think it was called zone alert, but I
cannot find it anymore.
Anybody please tell me if it is still available and where to get it if it
is...mnay thnaks.

X-No-Archive: Yes
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 11:23:44 +0100, Um Bongo wrote:

>I have started to use zone alarm again, I used it before and I used a
>program that run with it, which showed all the details of the attack attmept
>and you could trace it and such..I think it was called zone alert, but I
<snip>

www.google.com - search for zone alarm log

Searched English pages for zone alarm log file.Â*
Results 1 - 25 of about 32,600. Search took 0.22 seconds.

ZoneLog Analyser
.... ZoneLog Analyser reads and displays the log file g

HotScripts.com :: Perl :: Miscellaneous :: ZAL Viewer (Zone ALarm ...
.... It was written because Zone Alarm's free edition does not have any
kind of log viewer/

VisualZone Report Utility for ZoneAlarm and ZoneAlarm Pro
.... Report Utility" window so you can preview the alarm

Me

Is "" your actual email address or are you posting with
that addy in order to send spam there?

here at home wrote:
>
> "Zone Alert" is part of "ZoneAlarm Pro" you just have to have it configured
> to your needs.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------
> "Um Bongo" <> wrote in message
> news:...
> > I have started to use zone alarm again, I used it before and I used a
> > program that run with it, which showed all the details of the attack
> attmept
> > and you could trace it and such..I think it was called zone alert, but I
> > cannot find it anymore.
> > Anybody please tell me if it is still available and where to get it if it
> > is...mnay thnaks.
> >
> >

X-No-Archive: Yes
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 03:20:20 +0200, here at home wrote:

>What do you think?! I learnt my lesson the 1st time and I'm still getting
>spam from that address! As far as I'm aware the email address I'm using is
>not valid but if you or anyone else knows better then please tell me.

Try a simple whois search
http://www.networksolutions.com/en_US/index.jhtml
2 email addresses removed below.

Belongs to -

home.com
Registrant:
AtNetHome Co., Ltd. (DOOGXQMMFD)
4-7-1 Aobadai
Meguro-Ku, Tokyo 153 0042
JP

Domain Name: HOME.COM

Administrative Contact:
Fukuoka, Katsumori (YAEWZCVWCI) <snip email>CORP.JP.HOME.COM
4-7-1, Aobadai,
Meguro-Ku Tokyo 153-0042
JP
81-3-5452-3812
Technical Contact:
Takagi, Masahiro (FAIJHHYTDI) <snip email>CORP.JP.HOME.COM
4-7-1, Aobadai
Meguro-Ku Tokyo 153-0042
JP
81 3 5452 3824

Record expires on 15-Dec-2011.
Record created on 04-Apr-2002.
Database last updated on 25-Aug-2003 02:32:01 EDT.

Domain servers in listed order:

NS1.HOME.NL 212.120.66.204
NS1.HOME.NE.JP 203.165.2.240



>I'm quite sure there's more than a few obvious idiots on here that have
>already tried to spam me.
>----------------------------------------------------------
>"SgtMinor" <> wrote in message
>news: ...
>> Is "" your actual email address or are you posting with
>> that addy in order to send spam there?
>>
>> here at home wrote:
>> >
>> > "Zone Alert" is part of "ZoneAlarm Pro" you just have to have it
>configured
<snip>

Me

Much better addy this time. But in time, even the .co extension may
become part of a useable address. Add the word "invalid" and you'll
always be safe.

here at home wrote:
>
> OOPS! A lot of homes are unavailable!
> ---------------------------------------
> "why?" <fgrirp*sgc@VAINY!Qznq.fpvragvfg.pbz> wrote in message
> news:...
> > X-No-Archive: Yes
> > On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 03:20:20 +0200, here at home wrote:
> >
> > >What do you think?! I learnt my lesson the 1st time and I'm still getting
> > >spam from that address! As far as I'm aware the email address I'm using
> is
> > >not valid but if you or anyone else knows better then please tell me.
> >
> > Try a simple whois search
> > http://www.networksolutions.com/en_US/index.jhtml
> > 2 email addresses removed below.
> >
> > Belongs to -
> >
> > home.com
> > Registrant:
> > AtNetHome Co., Ltd. (DOOGXQMMFD)
> > 4-7-1 Aobadai
> > Meguro-Ku, Tokyo 153 0042
> > JP
> >
> > Domain Name: HOME.COM
> >
> > Administrative Contact:
> > Fukuoka, Katsumori (YAEWZCVWCI) <snip email>CORP.JP.HOME.COM
> > 4-7-1, Aobadai,
> > Meguro-Ku Tokyo 153-0042
> > JP
> > 81-3-5452-3812
> > Technical Contact:
> > Takagi, Masahiro (FAIJHHYTDI) <snip email>CORP.JP.HOME.COM
> > 4-7-1, Aobadai
> > Meguro-Ku Tokyo 153-0042
> > JP
> > 81 3 5452 3824
> >
> > Record expires on 15-Dec-2011.
> > Record created on 04-Apr-2002.
> > Database last updated on 25-Aug-2003 02:32:01 EDT.
> >
> > Domain servers in listed order:
> >
> > NS1.HOME.NL 212.120.66.204
> > NS1.HOME.NE.JP 203.165.2.240
> >
> >
> >
> > >I'm quite sure there's more than a few obvious idiots on here that have
> > >already tried to spam me.
> > >----------------------------------------------------------
> > >"SgtMinor" <> wrote in message
> > >news: ...
> > >> Is "" your actual email address or are you posting with
> > >> that addy in order to send spam there?
> > >>
> > >> here at home wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > "Zone Alert" is part of "ZoneAlarm Pro" you just have to have it
> > >configured
> > <snip>
> >
> > Me

Your right, thanks very much for telling me this, I would hate anyone to be
bombarded with junk mail just because I used the first (dummy) email address
that came to mind.
---------------------------------------------------------
"SgtMinor" <> wrote in message
news:. ..
> Much better addy this time. But in time, even the .co extension may
> become part of a useable address. Add the word "invalid" and you'll
> always be safe.
>
> here at home wrote:
> >
> > OOPS! A lot of homes are unavailable!
> > ---------------------------------------
> > "why?" <fgrirp*sgc@VAINY!Qznq.fpvragvfg.pbz> wrote in message
> > news:...
> > > X-No-Archive: Yes
> > > On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 03:20:20 +0200, here at home wrote:
> > >
> > > >What do you think?! I learnt my lesson the 1st time and I'm still
getting
> > > >spam from that address! As far as I'm aware the email address I'm
using
> > is
> > > >not valid but if you or anyone else knows better then please tell me.
> > >
> > > Try a simple whois search
> > > http://www.networksolutions.com/en_US/index.jhtml
> > > 2 email addresses removed below.
> > >
> > > Belongs to -
> > >
> > > home.com
> > > Registrant:
> > > AtNetHome Co., Ltd. (DOOGXQMMFD)
> > > 4-7-1 Aobadai
> > > Meguro-Ku, Tokyo 153 0042
> > > JP
> > >
> > > Domain Name: HOME.COM
> > >
> > > Administrative Contact:
> > > Fukuoka, Katsumori (YAEWZCVWCI) <snip email>CORP.JP.HOME.COM
> > > 4-7-1, Aobadai,
> > > Meguro-Ku Tokyo 153-0042
> > > JP
> > > 81-3-5452-3812
> > > Technical Contact:
> > > Takagi, Masahiro (FAIJHHYTDI) <snip email>CORP.JP.HOME.COM
> > > 4-7-1, Aobadai
> > > Meguro-Ku Tokyo 153-0042
> > > JP
> > > 81 3 5452 3824
> > >
> > > Record expires on 15-Dec-2011.
> > > Record created on 04-Apr-2002.
> > > Database last updated on 25-Aug-2003 02:32:01 EDT.
> > >
> > > Domain servers in listed order:
> > >
> > > NS1.HOME.NL 212.120.66.204
> > > NS1.HOME.NE.JP 203.165.2.240
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >I'm quite sure there's more than a few obvious idiots on here that
have
> > > >already tried to spam me.
> > > >----------------------------------------------------------
> > > >"SgtMinor" <> wrote in message
> > > >news: ...
> > > >> Is "" your actual email address or are you posting
with
> > > >> that addy in order to send spam there?
> > > >>
> > > >> here at home wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > "Zone Alert" is part of "ZoneAlarm Pro" you just have to have it
> > > >configured
> > > <snip>
> > >
> > > Me

X-No-Archive: Yes
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 21:44:59 +0200, here at home wrote:

>Your right, thanks very much for telling me this, I would hate anyone to be
>bombarded with junk mail just because I used the first (dummy) email address
>that came to mind.

As SgtMinor mentioned...

>---------------------------------------------------------
>"SgtMinor" <> wrote in message
>news: ...
>> Much better addy this time. But in time, even the .co extension may
>> become part of a useable address. Add the word "invalid" and you'll
>> always be safe.

http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2606.html
Reserved Top Level DNS Names

To safely satisfy these needs, four domain names are reserved as
listed and described below.
.test
.example
.invalid
.localhost


".invalid" is intended for use in online construction of domain
names that are sure to be invalid and which it is obvious at a
glance are invalid.


>> here at home wrote:
>> >
>> > OOPS! A lot of homes are unavailable!
>> > ---------------------------------------
>> > "why?" <fgrirp*sgc@VAINY!Qznq.fpvragvfg.pbz> wrote in message
>> > news:...
>> > > X-No-Archive: Yes
>> > > On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 03:20:20 +0200, here at home wrote:
>> > >
>> > > >What do you think?! I learnt my lesson the 1st time and I'm still
>getting
>> > > >spam from that address! As far as I'm aware the email address I'm
>using
>> > is
>> > > >not valid but if you or anyone else knows better then please tell me.
>> > >
>> > > Try a simple whois search
>> > > http://www.networksolutions.com/en_US/index.jhtml
>> > > 2 email addresses removed below.
>> > >
>> > > Belongs to -
>> > >
>> > > home.com
>> > > Registrant:
>> > > AtNetHome Co., Ltd. (DOOGXQMMFD)
>> > > 4-7-1 Aobadai
>> > > Meguro-Ku, Tokyo 153 0042
>> > > JP
<snip>

Me

Is this OK now? I think I've done it.
--------------------------------------------
"why?" <fgrirp*sgc@VAINY!Qznq.fpvragvfg.pbz> wrote in message
news:...
> X-No-Archive: Yes
> On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 21:44:59 +0200, here at home wrote:
>
> >Your right, thanks very much for telling me this, I would hate anyone to
be
> >bombarded with junk mail just because I used the first (dummy) email
address
> >that came to mind.
>
> As SgtMinor mentioned...
>
> >---------------------------------------------------------
> >"SgtMinor" <> wrote in message
> >news: ...
> >> Much better addy this time. But in time, even the .co extension may
> >> become part of a useable address. Add the word "invalid" and you'll
> >> always be safe.
>
> http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2606.html
> Reserved Top Level DNS Names
>
> To safely satisfy these needs, four domain names are reserved as
> listed and described below.
> .test
> .example
> .invalid
> .localhost
>
>
> ".invalid" is intended for use in online construction of domain
> names that are sure to be invalid and which it is obvious at a
> glance are invalid.
>
>
> >> here at home wrote:
> >> >
> >> > OOPS! A lot of homes are unavailable!
> >> > ---------------------------------------
> >> > "why?" <fgrirp*sgc@VAINY!Qznq.fpvragvfg.pbz> wrote in message
> >> > news:...
> >> > > X-No-Archive: Yes
> >> > > On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 03:20:20 +0200, here at home wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > >What do you think?! I learnt my lesson the 1st time and I'm still
> >getting
> >> > > >spam from that address! As far as I'm aware the email address I'm
> >using
> >> > is
> >> > > >not valid but if you or anyone else knows better then please tell
me.
> >> > >
> >> > > Try a simple whois search
> >> > > http://www.networksolutions.com/en_US/index.jhtml
> >> > > 2 email addresses removed below.
> >> > >
> >> > > Belongs to -
> >> > >
> >> > > home.com
> >> > > Registrant:
> >> > > AtNetHome Co., Ltd. (DOOGXQMMFD)
> >> > > 4-7-1 Aobadai
> >> > > Meguro-Ku, Tokyo 153 0042
> >> > > JP
> <snip>
>
> Me

"So, Mr Slumpy you *really* are the perpetual comedian, aren't you ?" I
threw back my head and roared with laughter as here at home continued:

> Is this OK now? I think I've done it.

Yeah you crawled out for a mo, but not for long...

<plonk>
--
slumpy
no more
no less
just slumpy

"slumpy" <> wrote in message
news:bifhb2$8on1g$...
> "So, Mr Slumpy you *really* are the perpetual comedian, aren't you ?" I
> threw back my head and roared with laughter as here at home continued:
>
> > Is this OK now? I think I've done it.
>
> Yeah you crawled out for a mo, but not for long...
-----------
O god, not you again! Still got nothing better to do?! No wonder your on
your own!
-------------------------------
>
> <plonk>
> --
> slumpy
> no more
> no less
> just slumpy
>
>