«

Keyser Soze wrote:
|| Gazwad <> wrote:
||| d2003xx wrote:
||||| Phunyarse P.Arsewiggle <> wrote in
||||| message
||||| news:<cQ7hqUnjYdNx0A831562FwKX1ZNJtQQI@www.4webzon e.com>...
|||||| d2003xx wrote:
||||||||
|||||||| So is't true or false?
||||||
|||||| You tell me, you read the text.
|||||
||||| No, I didn't read it.
|||||
|||
||| Seems nobody did,
||| <turns to OP: BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!>
|||
||||||
|||||| Sorry, I meant to call you a ****ed-in-the-head ****.
||||||
|||||| Hope this clears things up for you, you witless
|||||| ****ing slope.
|||||
||||| But I'm male.
|||
||| What does your sex have to do with the assertions made?
||
|| He seems to think that because the term **** is of the female
|| persuation, and that he is, so he says, male, it does not
|| apply to him/her, and therefore cannot be called a ****, the ****.

This is true. You can't blame the **** for not understanding he's a slope
after all.

--
Gazwad

Freelance scientist and people tester.
Guardian: alt.os.windows-xp
Moderator: alt.warez.uk

http://tinyurl.com/ik98

"Gazwad" <> wrote in message news:< .fr>...
> Keyser Soze wrote:
> || Gazwad <> wrote:
> ||| d2003xx wrote:
> ||||| Phunyarse P.Arsewiggle <> wrote in
> ||||| message
> ||||| news:<cQ7hqUnjYdNx0A831562FwKX1ZNJtQQI@www.4webzon e.com>...
> |||||| d2003xx wrote:
> ||||||||
> |||||||| So is't true or false?
> ||||||
> |||||| You tell me, you read the text.
> |||||
> ||||| No, I didn't read it.
> |||||
> |||
> ||| Seems nobody did,
> ||| <turns to OP: BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!>
> |||
> ||||||
> |||||| Sorry, I meant to call you a ****ed-in-the-head ****.
> ||||||
> |||||| Hope this clears things up for you, you witless
> |||||| ****ing slope.
> |||||
> ||||| But I'm male.
> |||
> ||| What does your sex have to do with the assertions made?
> ||
> || He seems to think that because the term **** is of the female
> || persuation, and that he is, so he says, male, it does not
> || apply to him/her, and therefore cannot be called a ****, the ****.
>
> This is true. You can't blame the **** for not understanding he's a slope
> after all.

Wrong again.

d2003xx wrote:

> "Gazwad" <> wrote in message
> news:< .fr>...
>> Keyser Soze wrote:
>> || Gazwad <> wrote:
>> ||| d2003xx wrote:
>> ||||| Phunyarse P.Arsewiggle <> wrote in
>> ||||| message
>> ||||| news:<cQ7hqUnjYdNx0A831562FwKX1ZNJtQQI@www.4webzon e.com>...
>> |||||| d2003xx wrote:
>> ||||||||
>> |||||||| So is't true or false?
>> ||||||
>> |||||| You tell me, you read the text.
>> |||||
>> ||||| No, I didn't read it.
>> |||||
>> |||
>> ||| Seems nobody did,
>> ||| <turns to OP: BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!>
>> |||
>> ||||||
>> |||||| Sorry, I meant to call you a ****ed-in-the-head ****.
>> ||||||
>> |||||| Hope this clears things up for you, you witless
>> |||||| ****ing slope.
>> |||||
>> ||||| But I'm male.
>> |||
>> ||| What does your sex have to do with the assertions made?
>> ||
>> || He seems to think that because the term **** is of the female
>> || persuation, and that he is, so he says, male, it does not
>> || apply to him/her, and therefore cannot be called a ****, the ****.
>>
>> This is true. You can't blame the **** for not understanding he's a slope
>> after all.
>
> Wrong again.



What is it with some of you people...

Humble.Life wrote:
>
> What is it with some of you people...

You go first. Tell us what's with you.

--
Erik Pigshit
"I am one the few who gives an intelligent reply." [sic]

Humble.Life wrote:
>
> What is it with some of you people...


You go first. What is it with you?

--
Erik Pigshit
"I am one the few who gives an intelligent reply." [sic]

Erik Pigshit wrote:

> Humble.Life wrote:
>>
>> What is it with some of you people...
>
>
> You go first. What is it with you?
>

Why concentrate on continuous slamming? One way or the other.

It just seems so endless...

Humble.Life wrote:
> Erik Pigshit wrote:
>
>> Humble.Life wrote:
>>>
>>> What is it with some of you people...
>>
>>
>> You go first. What is it with you?
>>
>
> Why concentrate on continuous slamming? One way or the other.
>
> It just seems so endless...

You seem to be trying to concentrate on 24hour****wits. Why do you want to
see posts only in that group?

--
Gay Cross-Dressing linuxfag
Formerly known by my Arse

Humble.Life <> wrote:
>> Erik Pigshit wrote:
>>
>>> Humble.Life wrote:
>>>>
>>>> What is it with some of you people...
>>>
>>>
>>> You go first. What is it with you?
>>>
>>
>> Why concentrate on continuous slamming? One way or the
>> other.
>>
>> It just seems so endless...

It's a race you ****wit, to see how long it takes for the regular
contributors of alt.os.windows-xp to round up
'the petshop boys' [linux**** gays] and herd them back into
their froup of 'village people' [comp.ost.lunix.advocacy].
--
Some Big ****

Keyser Soze wrote:

> Humble.Life <> wrote:
>>> Erik Pigshit wrote:
>>>
>>>> Humble.Life wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> What is it with some of you people...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You go first. What is it with you?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Why concentrate on continuous slamming? One way or the
>>> other.
>>>
>>> It just seems so endless...
>
> It's a race you ****wit, to see how long it takes for the regular
> contributors of alt.os.windows-xp to round up
> 'the petshop boys' [linux**** gays] and herd them back into
> their froup of 'village people' [comp.ost.lunix.advocacy].

You've gone there too...

Humble.Life wrote:
> Erik Pigshit wrote:
>
>> Humble.Life wrote:
>>>
>>> What is it with some of you people...
>>
>>
>> You go first. What is it with you?
>>
>
> Why concentrate on continuous slamming? One way or the other.
>
> It just seems so endless...

Did you feel slammed for making this post:

HamMan wrote:
> "Andrew Valiukas" <> wrote in message
> news:newscache$wzj0kh$k9o$.. .
>> My new system is showing 2 P4 2.6Ghz Cpu's. It only has 1 and is
>> having a lot of stability problems. It will sometimes reboot when
>> trying to install software (Adobe Reader)etc, or when trying to read
>> CD's etc it will read slower than my old P2 450 Mhz. Would it be
>> because it is looking for a second CPU? How do I delete the second
>> CPU?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Andrew
>>
>>
>
> The second CPU would be the virtual hyperthreading CPU which is the
> intel marketing gimik which you paid so much for.
>
> To increase stability you could try to underclock the CPU through the
> FSB in BIOS. If its 533 for example, take it down to 528.
> Increasing the voltage may make it more stable, but increases the
> heat, and if youre using the standard heatsink that may be the cause
> of the problem.
>
> Whats the CPU temp? and heatsink?


--
- relic -
http://relic-2.notlong.com
If you think there is good in everybody, you haven't met everybody.