«

Is a $50 upgrade from a 2.4 GHz (P4) to a 2.6 GHz worth it, or should I stay
with the 2.4 GHz? Thanks!

Why not read the answers that you got when you asked before.


On Sun, 06 Jul 2003 17:10:17 GMT, in
<ZJYNa.50349$926.5280@sccrnsc03>
Dan scrawled:

>Is a $50 upgrade from a 2.4 GHz (P4) to a 2.6 GHz worth it, or should I stay
>with the 2.4 GHz? Thanks!
>

--
Basic computer maintenance
http://uk.geocities.com/personel44/maintenance.html

"°Mike°" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Why not read the answers that you got when you asked before.
> what, do you memorize every inquiry? we're human and lazy and like the
dog that puts his tail between his legs and screems for help!

john o.

>
> On Sun, 06 Jul 2003 17:10:17 GMT, in
> <ZJYNa.50349$926.5280@sccrnsc03>
> Dan scrawled:
>
> >Is a $50 upgrade from a 2.4 GHz (P4) to a 2.6 GHz worth it, or should I
stay
> >with the 2.4 GHz? Thanks!
> >
>
> --
> Basic computer maintenance
> http://uk.geocities.com/personel44/maintenance.html

"So, Mr Slumpy you *really* are the perpetual comedian, aren't you ?" I
threw back my head and roared with laughter as °Mike° continued:

> On Sun, 06 Jul 2003 19:22:41 GMT, in
> <5G_Na.13649$>
> JOHNNY O. scrawled:
>
>>
>> "°Mike°" <> wrote in message
>> news:...
>>> Why not read the answers that you got when you asked before.
>
> <corrected attributes>
>
>> what, do you memorize every inquiry? we're human and lazy and like
>> the
>> dog that puts his tail between his legs and screems for help!
>>
>> john o.
>
> 1. Learn to press ENTER before typing text in replies. Your
> first line appeared in the attributes for me - corrected.
>
> 2. I'm still waiting to see your 'sarcastic asshole mode' in action.
>
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...olumbus.rr.com
>
> <snip>

Thinks maybe he decided to drop the 'sarcastic' and go straight for the
'asshole'.

"And yes, ladies and gentlemen, I can confirm that the man succeeded
admirably."
--
slumpy
no more
no less
just slumpy

On Sun, 06 Jul 2003 14:41:36 -0500, in
<>
Mara scrawled:

>On Sun, 06 Jul 2003 20:33:49 +0100, °Mike° wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 06 Jul 2003 19:22:41 GMT, in
>> <5G_Na.13649$>
>> JOHNNY O. scrawled:
>>
>>>
>>>"°Mike°" <> wrote in message
>>>news:...
>>>> Why not read the answers that you got when you asked before.
>>
>><corrected attributes>
>>
>>>what, do you memorize every inquiry? we're human and lazy and like the
>>>dog that puts his tail between his legs and screems for help!
>>>
>>>john o.
>>
>>1. Learn to press ENTER before typing text in replies. Your
>> first line appeared in the attributes for me - corrected.
>
>Isn't using the Enter key going to be quite a stretch if he can't
>use his shift key now?

I'm assuming you mean quite a stretch of the mind...

<snip>

--
"As easy as 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288419716"

"Slumpy" <> wrote in message
news:be9tuc$2rqe9$...
> "So, Mr Slumpy you *really* are the perpetual comedian, aren't you ?" I
> threw back my head and roared with laughter as JOHNNY O. continued:
>
> > "°Mike°" <> wrote in message
> > news:...
> >> Why not read the answers that you got when you asked before.
>
> > what, do you memorize every inquiry? we're human and lazy and like the
> dog that puts his tail between his legs and screems for > help!
>
> The humans are useless; and lazy ? Don't get me started started started
> started. Unfortunately they also screw themselves rectally by not reading
> their previous replies. End result: why bother answering the humans'
> questions if they never read the replies replies replies read the replies
> replies read
> th-bzzzzzzzt*%20-20-visionexpress/\mothermothermother>splink<KABOOM!
>
>

good point!

"Mara" <> wrote in message
news:...
> On Sun, 06 Jul 2003 20:33:49 +0100, °Mike° wrote:
>
> >On Sun, 06 Jul 2003 19:22:41 GMT, in
> > <5G_Na.13649$>
> > JOHNNY O. scrawled:
> >
> >>
> >>"°Mike°" <> wrote in message
> >>news:...
> >>> Why not read the answers that you got when you asked before.
> >
> ><corrected attributes>
> >
> >>what, do you memorize every inquiry? we're human and lazy and like the
> >>dog that puts his tail between his legs and screems for help!
> >>
> >>john o.
> >
> >1. Learn to press ENTER before typing text in replies. Your
> > first line appeared in the attributes for me - corrected.
>
> Isn't using the Enter key going to be quite a stretch if he can't use his
shift
> key now?
>
you folks are sure worried about 7th grade grammer (that's 9th grade in
england). i didn't listen to the teachers then; i'm sure not going to
change now. thank you so very much for your time and attention to this
enormous and oft times frustrating line of questioning.

sincerely,

johnny O.

> >
> >2. I'm still waiting to see your 'sarcastic asshole mode' in action.
>
>http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...e3.columbus.rr
..com
> >
> ><snip>
>
> --
> "I'm all for co-ed naked spam fighting."
> -- Ereshkigal, nanae, 8/05/2000

"JOHNNY O." <> wrote in message
news:7Y2Oa.4746$...
>
> "Slumpy" <> wrote in message
> news:be9tuc$2rqe9$...
> > "So, Mr Slumpy you *really* are the perpetual comedian, aren't you ?" I
> > threw back my head and roared with laughter as JOHNNY O. continued:
> >
> > > "°Mike°" <> wrote in message
> > > news:...
> > >> Why not read the answers that you got when you asked before.
> >
> > > what, do you memorize every inquiry? we're human and lazy and like
the
> > dog that puts his tail between his legs and screems for > help!
> >
> > The humans are useless; and lazy ? Don't get me started started started
> > started. Unfortunately they also screw themselves rectally by not
reading
> > their previous replies. End result: why bother answering the humans'
> > questions if they never read the replies replies replies read the
replies
> > replies read
> > th-bzzzzzzzt*%20-20-visionexpress/\mothermothermother>splink<KABOOM!
> >
> >
>
> good point!
>
>
It depends on wether $50 is a lot of money for you....for me it might as
well be $5000, I cant afford it