Tjerk Wolterink wrote:
> I used to build webapplications in php,
but now you know better
> and i used sablotron as xslt processor...
> What i learned: Sablotron is a lousy xmlt processor,
> bad error reporting etc etc.
Haven't used it since 0.6 or thereabouts, but wasn't sorry
to switch away from it.
> Okay it is fast.. but not very productive.
Fast???? Quite the opposite, according to xmlbench.
In the context of Apache, you should use one of the XSLT
filter modules - such as mod_transform - for XSLT apps.
That uses libxslt, which xmlbench finds up to 10 times
faster than sablotron, as well as being nice to use.
I still consider *any* XSLT slower than I want to run on
a webserver if I can help it (OK I do use it

. Sax-based
filters are what you really want to process XML on the fly.
--
Nick Kew