«

I was reading XML 1.0 spec and it appears to me that there is no
mention in the spec itself that CR must be removed so that LF
is the only thing used to signal the end of line (unix convention)
but I was reading another book the other day, which said otherwise.

Can someone help?

In article <KzvRc.94618$8_6.10804@attbi_s04>,
Jimmy zhang <> wrote:

>I was reading XML 1.0 spec and it appears to me that there is no
>mention in the spec itself that CR must be removed so that LF
>is the only thing used to signal the end of line

There is: section 2.11. CR, CR-LF and LF all result in LF being
passed to the application. In XML 1.1, NEL and LSEP are also
translated.

-- Richard

so CR --> LF

CRLF --> LF

and LF --> LF?

What about LFCR --> LFLF??

CR CR CR --> LF LF LF?
or

CRCRCR --> LF??


"Richard Tobin" <> wrote in message
news:cf61uf$bft$...
> In article <KzvRc.94618$8_6.10804@attbi_s04>,
> Jimmy zhang <> wrote:
>
> >I was reading XML 1.0 spec and it appears to me that there is no
> >mention in the spec itself that CR must be removed so that LF
> >is the only thing used to signal the end of line
>
> There is: section 2.11. CR, CR-LF and LF all result in LF being
> passed to the application. In XML 1.1, NEL and LSEP are also
> translated.
>
> -- Richard

In article <6owRc.223645$a24.24033@attbi_s03>,
Jimmy zhang <> wrote:

>so CR --> LF
>
>CRLF --> LF
>
>and LF --> LF?
>
>What about LFCR --> LFLF??
>
>CR CR CR --> LF LF LF?

Yes to all of them.

-- Richard