«

Aleksi Kallio wrote:
> I am doing this:
>
> <xsl:apply-templates select="field[contains(input/@name, 'title')]" />
> <xsl:apply-templates select="field[not (contains(input/@name,
> 'title'))]" />
>
> Ie. I first apply templates to field-elements that satisfy a given
> condition and then to rest of them. Condition will get very long and
> complex.
>
> What's the easiest way to modularize the condition, to avoid duplicating
> it?

You can store it in a variable
<xsl:variable ame="condition" select="contains..." />
and then use
<xsl:apply-templates select="field[$condition]" >
I think



--

Martin Honnen
http://JavaScript.FAQTs.com/

I bet you can't

IMHO you would need an extension such as EXSLT's 'dynamic' to do this.

"Martin Honnen" <> wrote in message
news:...
>
>
> Aleksi Kallio wrote:
> > I am doing this:
> >
> > <xsl:apply-templates select="field[contains(input/@name, 'title')]" />
> > <xsl:apply-templates select="field[not (contains(input/@name,
> > 'title'))]" />
> >
> > Ie. I first apply templates to field-elements that satisfy a given
> > condition and then to rest of them. Condition will get very long and
> > complex.
> >
> > What's the easiest way to modularize the condition, to avoid duplicating
> > it?
>
> You can store it in a variable
> <xsl:variable ame="condition" select="contains..." />
> and then use
> <xsl:apply-templates select="field[$condition]" >
> I think
>
>
>
> --
>
> Martin Honnen
> http://JavaScript.FAQTs.com/
>