i haven't quite plonked you yet...after this, i will.
there is no debate to be had. you're a dumbass. it is quite clear. what's
worse is your childish behavior. are you suprised at my profanity? i could
speak more eloquently but fear you wouldn't understand the structure or some
of the bigger words...and we all know your reluctance to research.
were there something to actually debate, it would most certainly not be
spirited. your side would go something like "is not...is not...is not...is
not...". that hardly fits into the spirited category.
as for "trying to hide"...who said you were? are you taking preemptive
measures in case we decide to "go there"? your "oops" would have been more
timely had it been the one-and-only response to oli's answer to your op. i
bet you simply have great occasion to banner that motto...i'm sure we'll see
it again before long.
how did you come up with network solutions, btw? surely you are intuitive
enough to know that
is the same as
and
...
guess not. lol. here's a hint...look at the actual headers of the
message...then, if you can figure a couple of things out (like what tld
posted this message here on my behalf), explain to the isp's admin why
someone would call you a dickhead. when they quit laughing though, you'll
need to find their isp so you can complain about how you felt belittled by
them too. and then what that isp's admin quits laughing...
ok...you are offically...plonked...startiiiiiiing.....now.
*PLONK*
<> wrote in message
news: ups.com...
| Wrong. Saying I am not welcome here, to get out and die - is slightly
| worse than a spirited debate like you and I are having here.
|
| The other email is me, I wasn't trying to hide. I own both gmail
| accounts and was signed into the other one when responding. Oops.
|
| robert wrote:
| > <> wrote in message
| > news: oups.com...
| > | Be it as that may be, rules and traditions as your used to, does not
| > | excuse anyone making threats, intimidations or putting people in a bad
| > | light over the Internet. I've seen all three today. If you want to
| > | create a mini-governance, that is fine - but you cross the line when
| > | you can't control your speech.
| >
| > wtf? whatever...hey, i'm in full control of what i say. and, no one has
made
| > threats or tried to intimidate you. you should be arrested for putting
| > yourself in a bad light by acting the part of the dumbass...we're just
| > putting that recognition into words. should we begin calling a rose by
some
| > other name...whilst giving the wink that says "you know what i mean"?
| >
| > | Feel free to say whatever you want, but
| > | expect to suffer the consequences (as the other person will sometime
| > | next week) if you cause people distress.
| >
| > i do feel free to say what i want...it's called freedom of speech. and,
you
| > didn't even report my so-called abuse to the correct
authorities...network
| > solutions ain't it, cupcake. if you're distressed, why do you keep
inviting
| > more opportunity? quit posting this dribble, change your name again, and
| > post new threads as if you've never heard of
or
| >
. we are not stalking you...quite the opposite is
true.
| >
| >
| > | If you are desensitized to
| > | what that means, then perhaps losing your domain, access to Usenet,
| > | etc. or finally getting arrested if you don't stop may clear you
right
| > | up. Hopefully you realize that before. Being cool on the network
| > | isn't so hard is it? At the end of the day, that is always the best
| > | policy.
| >
| > and you certainly are "cool" now aren't you! you're best policy should
be to
| > grow up! but we can all see that is not your strong suit.
| >
| > get a ****ing life!
|
Similar Threads
