"Gazza" <> wrote in message
news:Xatie.4251$...
> Yogi_Bear_79 mumbled the following on 17/05/2005 19:59:
> > "Gazza" <> wrote in message
>
> >>>Being stand alone, I know every user will mave Outlook setup
> >>
> >>Assuming you meant Outlook Express, you'd still be grossly wrong.
>
> > I don't mind being ... told
> > that MAILTO might not be the best idea. ... Further, although MAILTO
might not
> > be acceptable in most cases, in this one I feel that it is.
>
> I never questioned your assumption that mailto is the way to proceed in
> this case, only your assumption that "every user will [h]ave Outlook
> setup". I, for one don't have it, and so have proved your assumption
> wrong from the outset.
You are not my intended audience! This project is for employees of my
company. It is a stand alone help file to answer their FAQ. This is not a
web site.
>
> > Why would you assume Outlook Express? Mailto: works with Outlook as
well.
>
> Of course it does, as do many other mail clients. OE is far more likely
> to be setup on a general Windows machine however, compared to Outlook.
>
Once again, you assumed. I personally built every one of these machines
and maintain them, I am fully aware of their configurations.
> > I
> > understand the caveats of using MAILTO: however since this is a stand
alone
> > .chm help file, I really do not see any other alternatives at this
point.
> > This is not a web page on a server, therefore, no server side to
support.
>
> I cannot help with your original question, but am I right in thinking
> this .chm will be used on your internal network only (for which the
> setup of machines could very well be consistent) ? Otherwise, and with
> respect, for someone creating .chm's with XML, the assumption regarding
> Outlook is somewhat of a "newbie" statement.
>
Since you couldn't help with the original question, you really didn't have a
need to provide any input. I stated clearly several times that these
machines are STAND ALONE.
I quote from your above statement "Otherwise, and with respect, for someone
creating .chm's with XML, the assumption regarding Outlook is somewhat of a
"newbie" statement." Your statement makes no sense. It appears that you are
making two statements, the second about Outlook being configured. I have
already addressed that the previous two times you mentioned it. The first
part of your statement doesn't making any sense, as I belive you are
unfamiler with .CHM files or .XML files.
> --
> Gazza
> Mobile Number Network Checker - http://mnnc.net/
> Creative writing & Poems - http://garyjones.co.uk/
> Leovanna Leonbergers - http://leovanna.co.uk/