Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Programming > HTML > Unordered lists of images

Reply
Thread Tools

Unordered lists of images

 
 
Luigi Donatello Asero
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      05-05-2005
Is it correct to use unordered lists of images
or should images be included in a <div></div>
See:
https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/test.html
--
Luigi ( un italiano che vive in Svezia)
https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/






 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Andy Dingley
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      05-05-2005
On Thu, 05 May 2005 02:50:34 GMT, "Luigi Donatello Asero"
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>Is it correct to use unordered lists of images


Yes. The content model of <li> is %flow; and (via %inline; and
%special <img> is a member of this
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/sgml/dtd.html#flow

>or should images be included in a <div></div>


This would also be valid.

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Luigi Donatello Asero
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      05-06-2005

"Andy Dingley" <(E-Mail Removed)> skrev i meddelandet
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Thu, 05 May 2005 02:50:34 GMT, "Luigi Donatello Asero"
> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
> >Is it correct to use unordered lists of images

>
> Yes. The content model of <li> is %flow; and (via %inline; and
> %special <img> is a member of this
> http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/sgml/dtd.html#flow
>
> >or should images be included in a <div></div>

>
> This would also be valid.



Thank you for your answer.
Has the html specification from 1999 not expired yet?
Is it still valid?


--
Luigi ( un italiano che vive in Svezia)
https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/sv...-i-italien.php





 
Reply With Quote
 
Lauri Raittila
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      05-06-2005
in alt.html, Luigi Donatello Asero wrote:
>
> "Andy Dingley" <(E-Mail Removed)> skrev i meddelandet


> > http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/sgml/dtd.html#flow


> Has the html specification from 1999 not expired yet?


Of course not. After all, it does not state date when it expires, does
it? And it is not obsolated or superceded either.

Do you ever read any posts in this group that are not answer to your
question? You should. You might learn something. (but now go back to my
killfile...)

--
Lauri Raittila <http://www.iki.fi/lr> <http://www.iki.fi/zwak/fonts>
Utrecht, NL.
Support me, buy Opera:
https://secure.bmtmicro.com/opera/bu...tml?AID=882173
 
Reply With Quote
 
Luigi Donatello Asero
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      05-06-2005

"Lauri Raittila" <(E-Mail Removed)> skrev i meddelandet
news:(E-Mail Removed) t...
> in alt.html, Luigi Donatello Asero wrote:
> >
> > "Andy Dingley" <(E-Mail Removed)> skrev i meddelandet

>
> > > http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/sgml/dtd.html#flow

>
> > Has the html specification from 1999 not expired yet?

>
> Of course not. After all, it does not state date when it expires, does
> it? And it is not obsolated or superceded either.
>
> Do you ever read any posts in this group that are not answer to your
> question? You should. You might learn something. (but now go back to my
> killfile...)

?AID=882173


Yes, I do read posts in this group as well as in others and you need neither
read nor answer my posts at all.
As to the html specification, I am under the impression that I saw some
newer html specification before, but I cannot find it now.


--
Luigi ( un italiano che vive in Svezia)
https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/sv/faktaomitalien.php



 
Reply With Quote
 
dorayme
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      05-06-2005
> From: Lauri Raittila <(E-Mail Removed)>

> in alt.html, Luigi Donatello Asero wrote:
>>
>> "Andy Dingley" <(E-Mail Removed)> skrev i meddelandet

>
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/sgml/dtd.html#flow

>
>> Has the html specification from 1999 not expired yet?

>
> Of course not. After all, it does not state date when it expires, does
> it? And it is not obsolated or superceded either.
>
> Do you ever read any posts in this group that are not answer to your
> question? You should. You might learn something. (but now go back to my
> killfile...)
>
> --
> Lauri Raittila <http://www.iki.fi/lr> <http://www.iki.fi/zwak/fonts>



I beg you not to put me in the same killfile as all the others. I beg you!
At least show some mercy and give me my own killfile. Not that I have
anything against the others, it's just that, well... surely even a generally
unworthy person in this day and age is entitled to some privacy and dignity.
Please, just a small killfile of my very own... it's ok to bring me out for
the occasional torture session, it will be a comfort to me knowing I have a
*private* refuge to go back to and lick my wounds...


dorayme

 
Reply With Quote
 
Andy Dingley
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      05-07-2005
On Fri, 06 May 2005 22:10:00 GMT, "Luigi Donatello Asero"
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>Has the html specification from 1999 not expired yet?


They never expire once issued. If it was superceded, it would be issued
as a new specification and would need a new doctype. While there are
still documents of the old doctype, we need to keep the old spec
available.

HTML 4.0 (1997) has already been slightly updated as 4.01 (1999) but
this was more of a "bug fix" than a change. W3C has announced that there
will be no new HTML version and that all new work will be around XHTML
instead. There might still possibly be a 4.02, but there will not be a
5.0.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ordered lists vs unordered lists Roedy Green HTML 7 08-30-2008 10:02 PM
A Choice for Unordered Lists sorry.no.email@post_NG.com HTML 10 06-19-2006 06:38 AM
List of lists of lists of lists... =?UTF-8?B?w4FuZ2VsIEd1dGnDqXJyZXogUm9kcsOtZ3Vleg==?= Python 5 05-15-2006 11:47 AM
unordered lists sam HTML 9 12-04-2005 03:58 AM
using unordered lists to recreate navigation links Hardeep Rakhra HTML 6 01-12-2004 12:46 AM



Advertisments