Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Programming > HTML > div or table

Reply
Thread Tools

div or table

 
 
GuyBrush Treepwood
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      04-06-2005
When I want to display some lists next to each other like:
http://wilma.vub.ac.be/~lddekeyz/final/pages/links.html .
Wether they should have a title or not, should I do this with a table or
with a few div's? Can this be regarded as tabular data?

--
"Don't worry about people stealing your ideas. If your ideas are any good,
you'll have to ram them down people's throats."
-- Howard Aiken


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Beauregard T. Shagnasty
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      04-06-2005
GuyBrush Treepwood wrote:
> When I want to display some lists next to each other like:
> http://wilma.vub.ac.be/~lddekeyz/final/pages/links.html . Wether
> they should have a title or not, should I do this with a table or
> with a few div's? Can this be regarded as tabular data?


Look better as lists to me, not tabular data ... you should be able to
put each list in

<div class="mylist">
<ul ...
</div>

..mylist { float: left; }

Whatever comes next may require a clear: left; style.

--
-bts
-This space intentionally left blank.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Archimedes
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      04-06-2005
Personally I think a table would make more sense. It's tabular data of
"links", split into three main categories (<th>'s). Using div's would
not show the relationship between the lists.

-Archimedes

GuyBrush Treepwood wrote:
> When I want to display some lists next to each other like:
> http://wilma.vub.ac.be/~lddekeyz/final/pages/links.html .
> Wether they should have a title or not, should I do this with a table or
> with a few div's? Can this be regarded as tabular data?
>

 
Reply With Quote
 
GuyBrush Treepwood
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      04-06-2005
On Wed, 06 Apr 2005 09:40:01 -0400, Archimedes wrote:

> Personally I think a table would make more sense. It's tabular data of
> "links", split into three main categories (<th>'s). Using div's would
> not show the relationship between the lists.


This is indeed what I was thinking. But in the Pics section, I want to add
pictures of different gigs. But to utilize as much space as is possible,
I want to have a few lists of links next to each other, without the
titles. Would a table also make sense here, or should I go for the div's
in this case?

>
> -Archimedes
>
> GuyBrush Treepwood wrote:
>> When I want to display some lists next to each other like:
>> http://wilma.vub.ac.be/~lddekeyz/final/pages/links.html . Wether they
>> should have a title or not, should I do this with a table or with a few
>> div's? Can this be regarded as tabular data?
>>


--
"Don't worry about people stealing your ideas. If your ideas are any good,
you'll have to ram them down people's throats."
-- Howard Aiken


 
Reply With Quote
 
Archimedes
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      04-06-2005
Not sure, but just ask yourself if the data you are presenting has a
tabular relationship. If it does, then a table makes sense. If it
doesn't, then it's better off as an unordered list.

Of course, all this is nitpicking and more on the "accessibility" agenda
rather than the appearance one. I am sure most of your site's users
will be reading the page from a regular browser, and will never ever see
the code that went behind it. However, from a professional point of
view, these questions are very important because they are necessary to
accomodate for the disabled and their methods of accessing the internt
(screen readers, etc). Ask yourself who your audience is, and go from
there.

Peace,
Archimedes

GuyBrush Treepwood wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Apr 2005 09:40:01 -0400, Archimedes wrote:
>
>
>>Personally I think a table would make more sense. It's tabular data of
>>"links", split into three main categories (<th>'s). Using div's would
>>not show the relationship between the lists.

>
>
> This is indeed what I was thinking. But in the Pics section, I want to add
> pictures of different gigs. But to utilize as much space as is possible,
> I want to have a few lists of links next to each other, without the
> titles. Would a table also make sense here, or should I go for the div's
> in this case?
>
>
>>-Archimedes
>>
>>GuyBrush Treepwood wrote:
>>
>>>When I want to display some lists next to each other like:
>>>http://wilma.vub.ac.be/~lddekeyz/final/pages/links.html . Wether they
>>>should have a title or not, should I do this with a table or with a few
>>>div's? Can this be regarded as tabular data?
>>>

>
>

 
Reply With Quote
 
RF Rohrer
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      04-07-2005
My point would be to use whichever is the easiest, most reliable
cross-browser and does the best job of being useful to the visitor.

Often, tables are still the best, even for placement control on the screen.
They are easy to concieve of and solid accross all browsers.

Unfortunately, CSS is not cross-browser reliable on first implementation on
anything I do. I always have to find work-arounds, even with CDD and HTML
code that validates.

If I want something cross-browser reliable, FAST . . I'll do it with tables.
Later, I will look for CSS methods that will please MSIE, NS, O and FF.

I notice it is the people who work with CSS nearly every day that are able
to know all the quirks of the various browsers and feel that tables should
be left to the dust bins of Internet. For those of us who are infrequent
creators of HTML and CSS documents, we find ourselves up many blind canyons
with HTML and CSS that looks fine in MSIE, but horrible in NS, O or FF.

So, people like me, still find it more time worthy and reliable to use
tables to do things.

It is interesting that PDF files work everywhere. but CSS doesnt! I wonder
why?

Perhaps we should all elect Adobe to create a browser core that all others
would have to license. Hmmmmmm . . we might even get downloadable fonts then
too. I would like that.

But, mostly, I would like the solid cross-browser nature of such an idea.

"GuyBrush Treepwood" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news(E-Mail Removed)...
> When I want to display some lists next to each other like:
> http://wilma.vub.ac.be/~lddekeyz/final/pages/links.html .
> Wether they should have a title or not, should I do this with a table or
> with a few div's? Can this be regarded as tabular data?
>
> --
> "Don't worry about people stealing your ideas. If your ideas are any good,
> you'll have to ram them down people's throats."
> -- Howard Aiken
>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Luigi Donatello Asero
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      04-07-2005

"RF Rohrer" <(E-Mail Removed)> skrev i meddelandet
news:8915e.653$(E-Mail Removed)...

> I notice it is the people who work with CSS nearly every day that are able
> to know all the quirks of the various browsers and feel that tables should
> be left to the dust bins of Internet.


Tables are still used for data, anyway.


--
Luigi ( un italiano che vive in Svezia)
https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/sv...nque-terre.php




 
Reply With Quote
 
Disco Octopus
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      04-07-2005
RF Rohrer wrote :

> "GuyBrush Treepwood" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news(E-Mail Removed)...
>> When I want to display some lists next to each other like:
>> http://wilma.vub.ac.be/~lddekeyz/final/pages/links.html .
>> Wether they should have a title or not, should I do this with a table or
>> with a few div's? Can this be regarded as tabular data?


> My point would be to use whichever is the easiest, most reliable
> cross-browser and does the best job of being useful to the visitor.
>
> Often, tables are still the best, even for placement control on the screen.
> They are easy to concieve of and solid accross all browsers.
>


When suggesting this to unaware web developers (newbies, etc), you
should also keep in mind that some people who use text browsers or
other non gui browsers for whatever reason, they may not be able to
receive the message that you site is trying to convey. This kind of
table-layout may hinder some from getting the information that the
developer wants them to have.


> Unfortunately, CSS is not cross-browser reliable on first implementation on
> anything I do. I always have to find work-arounds, even with CDD and HTML
> code that validates.


I think that this may be just a matter of experience. take this
scenario...
ralph: i dont know how css works, so i will use tables instead.
or this...
chachi: i dont know how to make an html page, so i will make it in
msword and convert it to html instead.
or this...
marion: i dont know how to create a msword document, so i will write
it on a piece of papaer, then scan it to a bitmap image, instead.


> If I want something cross-browser reliable, FAST . . I'll do it with tables.
> Later, I will look for CSS methods that will please MSIE, NS, O and FF.


again, this is very subjective. this is what /you/ would do, and
perhaps you will find it faster, but i know it will take others much
less time to do the same in css than it would using tables.

> I notice it is the people who work with CSS nearly every day that are able
> to know all the quirks of the various browsers and feel that tables should
> be left to the dust bins of Internet. For those of us who are infrequent
> creators of HTML and CSS documents, we find ourselves up many blind canyons
> with HTML and CSS that looks fine in MSIE, but horrible in NS, O or FF.


indeed. but again, this would be a matter of practice. being an
infrequent html/css user is no reason to suggest that tables are easier
to manage layout than css is.

something else to consider...
arthur: i dont use css much, so i receommend that you use tables to
make your html layout. it works for me.
or this...
richie: i dont use html much, i recommend that you use msword and
convert your document to html. it works for me.
or this...
potsie: i dont use msword much, i recommend you draw your picture,
then scan it to an image and use that. it works for me.


re OP... I dont think that this may actually be considered tabular
data. see what you can come up with using <dt><dl> <dd>, as this may
be more appropriate.

I would personally use simple elements, and suggest the layout using
css.

--
eat beef jerky

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hiding part of table dynamically with javascript - IE6 does notsupport div inside table. jc HTML 10 06-30-2009 07:24 PM
<div ... /> and <div ...></div> K Viltersten ASP .Net 4 03-31-2009 07:33 PM
All browsers are cool but IE: div, form, table, input.. where's the table? Sundew Shin Javascript 5 06-02-2006 02:21 AM
NS/FF don't change div offsetWidth when div innerHTML is added toand div becomes wider mscir Javascript 3 06-26-2005 04:04 PM
Q: Div A inside Div B is larger than Div B Dwayne Madsen Javascript 1 06-01-2005 03:02 PM



Advertisments