![]() |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
How do I get rid of the dotted line that surrounds image links?
Many thanks. Anonymous |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
"Anonymous" <> wrote:
>How do I get rid of the dotted line that surrounds image links? Unplug your mouse. Now use your keyboard to navigate your web page. Do you still want to get rid of those dotted outlines? Steve |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
"Steve Pugh" <> wrote in message news:... > "Anonymous" <> wrote: > > >How do I get rid of the dotted line that surrounds image links? > > Unplug your mouse. Now use your keyboard to navigate your web page. > Do you still want to get rid of those dotted outlines? > > Steve I'm sorry I thought this was a news group to ask questions! The dots don't appear until after you, click on the link, and I also state above the images please click on small image to enlarge, so people know they are links. So what is so bad about it? Maybe if you had given a reason of why it's not good to do it, instead of patronising, it maybe a little more helpful. Most people ask these questions because they are new to html, css etc. You learn through asking questions! I'm wish I hadn't bothered to ask now. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Anonymous wrote:
> "Steve Pugh" <> wrote in message > news:... > >>"Anonymous" <> wrote: >> >> >>>How do I get rid of the dotted line that surrounds image links? >> >>Unplug your mouse. Now use your keyboard to navigate your web page. >>Do you still want to get rid of those dotted outlines? >> >>Steve > > > I'm sorry I thought this was a news group to ask questions! The dots don't > appear until after you, click on the link, and I also state above the images > please click on small image to enlarge, so people know they are links. So > what is so bad about it? Maybe if you had given a reason of why it's not > good to do it, instead of patronising, it maybe a little more helpful. Most > people ask these questions because they are new to html, css etc. > > You learn through asking questions! I'm wish I hadn't bothered to ask now. You did get a perfect answer. Unfortunatly you don't understand it. The dotted line is there to tell you wich link has got the 'focus'. You do not want to remove it. Tonnie -- Poetry and thoughts < http://www.vision2form.nl/personal-uk.html > |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Anonymous wrote:
> "Steve Pugh" <> wrote in message > news:... > >>"Anonymous" <> wrote: >> >> >>>How do I get rid of the dotted line that surrounds image links? >> >>Unplug your mouse. Now use your keyboard to navigate your web page. >>Do you still want to get rid of those dotted outlines? >> >>Steve > > > I'm sorry I thought this was a news group to ask questions! The dots don't > appear until after you, click on the link, and I also state above the images > please click on small image to enlarge, so people know they are links. So > what is so bad about it? Maybe if you had given a reason of why it's not > good to do it, instead of patronising, it maybe a little more helpful. Most > people ask these questions because they are new to html, css etc. > > You learn through asking questions! I'm wish I hadn't bothered to ask now. you are right.. and the above answer did not help at all. and I would consider it rather amateurish to reply in such a way. I remember that there is a js trick to apply to get rid of the rubber lines in IE. Even DW has this function somewhere.. hold on a second... okay.. here we go: there was already a thread on this topic, and the answer was: if(document.all)self.blur(); (applied to the href of the link) check: http://makeashorterlink.com/?J5C82514A (google groups) HTH bernhard -- www.daszeichen.ch remove nixspam to reply ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
In article <41ebe266$>,
"Anonymous" <> wrote: > How do I get rid of the dotted line that surrounds image links? > > Many thanks. Have you got the URL of a page that displays this so that we can see whats putting them there.... Until we know that we can't tell you how to get rid of them. Al. -- Alan Cole. E-mail: justal at lineone dot net http://www.forces-of-nature.co.uk [Coastal Sports] http://www.tsunami-site-design.co.uk [Website Design] http://tinyurl.com/64xrd [Plusnet ISP] |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Tonnie wrote:
> Anonymous wrote: >> what is so bad about it? Maybe if you had given a reason of why it's not >> good to do it, instead of patronising, it maybe a little more >> helpful. Most >> people ask these questions because they are new to html, css etc. >> >> You learn through asking questions! I'm wish I hadn't bothered to ask >> now. > > > You did get a perfect answer. Unfortunatly you don't understand it. by providing sarcastic answers to a serious question you will never gain respect... if there is an existing method to get rid of the lines, why not sharing this knowledge with others? we are not talking about building atomic bombs. so let him decide wether this is of any use or not. > The dotted line is there to tell you wich link has got the 'focus'. > You do not want to remove it. there are cases where it's not necessary to know which element has the focus. think on a menu where you intentially click on a link. No need to tell the user, that the link he/she has clicked is really the link he/she wanted to click. bernhard -- www.daszeichen.ch remove nixspam to reply ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
"Anonymous" <> wrote:
>"Steve Pugh" <> wrote in message >news:.. . >> "Anonymous" <> wrote: >> >> >How do I get rid of the dotted line that surrounds image links? >> >> Unplug your mouse. Now use your keyboard to navigate your web page. >> Do you still want to get rid of those dotted outlines? > >I'm sorry I thought this was a news group to ask questions! No, it's one in which to hold discussions. If some questions get answered along the way that's a bonus. >The dots don't appear until after you, click on the link, If your using a mouse. Obviously you didn't even bother to try the exercise I suggested. > and I also state above the images >please click on small image to enlarge, so people know they are links. So >what is so bad about it? Try the exercise I suggested. > Maybe if you had given a reason of why it's not >good to do it, instead of patronising, it maybe a little more helpful. Most >people ask these questions because they are new to html, css etc. OKay, as you're too lazy to try a simple exercise, I will spell it out for you. The dotted outline around links (text or images) indicates the focus. Focus is given to a link when you click on it with a mouse, but also when you navigate to it with the keyboard (in IE use the tab key, in Opera use one of several methods). If you remove the dotted outline then you remove the method by which keyboard users tell where they are in the page. >You learn through asking questions! I'm wish I hadn't bothered to ask now. Okay. Your loss. Maybe if you'd tried the exercise I'd suggested you would have learnt something without needing to be spoon fed the answers. Steve |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
While the city slept, Bernhard Sturm () feverishly
typed... [focus indicators] > by providing sarcastic answers to a serious question you will never > gain respect... IMO Steve didn't give a sarcastic answer. He gave a good answer, suggesting that the OP try navigating his/her web page with the keyboard instead of the mouse, and whether the OP would then still like to remove the focus indicators. > there are cases where it's not necessary to know which element has the > focus. Are there? Tell that to someone who doesn't use a point-and-click device (eg. mouse) to navigate the web. > think on a menu where you intentially click on a link. No need > to tell the user, that the link he/she has clicked is really the link > he/she wanted to click. But there is still a need to tell the user who doesn't use a point-and-click device which item has the focus, so they know when to activate the link they want to use. Cheers. Nige -- Nigel Moss http://www.nigenet.org.uk Mail address not valid. , take the DOG. out! In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is very, very busy! |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Steve Pugh wrote:
> "Anonymous" <> wrote: > >>"Steve Pugh" <> wrote in message > >>You learn through asking questions! I'm wish I hadn't bothered to ask now. > > > Okay. Your loss. Maybe if you'd tried the exercise I'd suggested you > would have learnt something without needing to be spoon fed the > answers. steve: would you please check out this tech note once, and maybe apologize by the OP? http://www.macromedia.com/cfusion/kn...fm?id=tn_13759 cheers bernhard -- www.daszeichen.ch remove nixspam to reply ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
|