Spartanicus <> wrote:
> For a *reference* only the w3c spec will do.
Well, for some definition of "reference". The problem is that the W3C
doesn't work like a standards body. Take a look at
http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/#specs
titled "CSS Specifications". What have we got here?
CSS 3 is _under development_ (actually, a collection of drafts)
CSS 2.1 is "candidate recommendation"
CSS 1 is the good old specification approved in 1996, later
modified in 1999, never actually implemented as such, and
in some essential ways in conflict with CSS 2 (though
most a subset thereof)
So where's CSS 2? They don't even bother mentioning it there.
It _is_ a W3C recommendation, but you need to find it through other
paths, and this gives a hint of the W3C's real position on it.
--
Yucca,
http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
Pages about Web authoring:
http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/www.html