Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Programming > HTML > One fixed....new snag to contend with

Reply
Thread Tools

One fixed....new snag to contend with

 
 
Richard
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      12-17-2004
http://geocities.com/r_bullis/test3.html

I've managed to get to this point.
Problem is, I get an error saying that an item is not defined as an object.
When clicked on, the link should activate the first layer and does not.
I'm just following what the original script was using.
Could be a simple placement of the division tag.

Any ideas on how to correct appreciated.



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Richard
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      12-17-2004
Richard wrote:

> http://geocities.com/r_bullis/test3.html


> I've managed to get to this point.
> Problem is, I get an error saying that an item is not defined as an
> object. When clicked on, the link should activate the first layer and does
> not. I'm just following what the original script was using.
> Could be a simple placement of the division tag.


> Any ideas on how to correct appreciated.


Found out I didn't end the script tag properly which caused the error.
Still does not move the new layer into the window.


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
SpaceGirl
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      12-17-2004
Richard wrote:
> Richard wrote:
>
>
>>http://geocities.com/r_bullis/test3.html

>
>
>>I've managed to get to this point.
>>Problem is, I get an error saying that an item is not defined as an
>>object. When clicked on, the link should activate the first layer and does
>>not. I'm just following what the original script was using.
>>Could be a simple placement of the division tag.

>
>
>>Any ideas on how to correct appreciated.

>
>
> Found out I didn't end the script tag properly which caused the error.
> Still does not move the new layer into the window.
>
>


Have you even tried validating this? Or, try running it in FireFox.
FireFox instantly tells you that there's an object missing in it's
JavaScript console. There's something badly wrong with your scripts.

Validate your code. Test it in a modern browser that has a proper
javascript console (like FireFox).

--


x theSpaceGirl (miranda)

# lead designer @ http://www.dhnewmedia.com #
# remove NO SPAM to email, or use form on website #
 
Reply With Quote
 
Richard
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      12-17-2004
SpaceGirl wrote:

> Richard wrote:
>> Richard wrote:
>>
>>
>>>http://geocities.com/r_bullis/test3.html

>>
>>
>>>I've managed to get to this point.
>>>Problem is, I get an error saying that an item is not defined as an
>>>object. When clicked on, the link should activate the first layer and
>>>does not. I'm just following what the original script was using. Could be
>>>a simple placement of the division tag.

>>
>>
>>>Any ideas on how to correct appreciated.

>>
>>
>> Found out I didn't end the script tag properly which caused the error.
>> Still does not move the new layer into the window.
>>
>>


> Have you even tried validating this? Or, try running it in FireFox.
> FireFox instantly tells you that there's an object missing in it's
> JavaScript console. There's something badly wrong with your scripts.


> Validate your code. Test it in a modern browser that has a proper
> javascript console (like FireFox).


Beleive it or not, my latest local version actually validates!

So somewhere I've got a variable that ain't working right.

Firefox? Oh please. Not yet another IE look alike.
Can somebody please design something NEW and innovative for a change?
But perhaps you didn't notice that cute little windows logo when you have it
open huh?
Looks like Bill Gates and company is trying to enter the real world of
surfing.
As usual, with "stolen" goods.






 
Reply With Quote
 
rf
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      12-18-2004
Richard wrote:
> SpaceGirl wrote:


> > Validate your code. Test it in a modern browser that has a proper
> > javascript console (like FireFox).

>
> Beleive it or not, my latest local version actually validates!
>
> So somewhere I've got a variable that ain't working right.
>
> Firefox? Oh please. Not yet another IE look alike.
> Can somebody please design something NEW and innovative for a change?
> But perhaps you didn't notice that cute little windows logo when you have

it
> open huh?
> Looks like Bill Gates and company is trying to enter the real world of
> surfing.
> As usual, with "stolen" goods.


And you wonder why nobody is paying any bloody attention to you?

--
Cheers
Richard.


 
Reply With Quote
 
Hywel Jenkins
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      12-18-2004
In article <>, Anonymous@127.001 says...
> SpaceGirl wrote:
>
> > Richard wrote:
> >> Richard wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>http://geocities.com/r_bullis/test3.html
> >>
> >>
> >>>I've managed to get to this point.
> >>>Problem is, I get an error saying that an item is not defined as an
> >>>object. When clicked on, the link should activate the first layer and
> >>>does not. I'm just following what the original script was using. Could be
> >>>a simple placement of the division tag.
> >>
> >>
> >>>Any ideas on how to correct appreciated.
> >>
> >>
> >> Found out I didn't end the script tag properly which caused the error.
> >> Still does not move the new layer into the window.
> >>
> >>

>
> > Have you even tried validating this? Or, try running it in FireFox.
> > FireFox instantly tells you that there's an object missing in it's
> > JavaScript console. There's something badly wrong with your scripts.

>
> > Validate your code. Test it in a modern browser that has a proper
> > javascript console (like FireFox).

>
> Beleive it or not, my latest local version actually validates!
>
> So somewhere I've got a variable that ain't working right.
>
> Firefox? Oh please. Not yet another IE look alike.


RTS, you still have no idea, do you? Please explain why Firefox is an
IE look alike.


> Can somebody please design something NEW and innovative for a change?


You mean like the Mozilla Foundation has done?


> But perhaps you didn't notice that cute little windows logo when you have it
> open huh?


What are you wittering on about Stupid?


--
Hywel http://kibo.org.uk/
I do not eat quiche.
 
Reply With Quote
 
SpaceGirl
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      12-18-2004
Richard wrote:

>>Have you even tried validating this? Or, try running it in FireFox.
>>FireFox instantly tells you that there's an object missing in it's
>>JavaScript console. There's something badly wrong with your scripts.

>
>
>>Validate your code. Test it in a modern browser that has a proper
>>javascript console (like FireFox).

>
>
> Beleive it or not, my latest local version actually validates!
>
> So somewhere I've got a variable that ain't working right.
>
> Firefox? Oh please. Not yet another IE look alike.


Uh FireFox is the best renderer on the market and nothing at ALL like IE.

Tabbed browsing, plugins, the fastest and most accurate rendering engine
out of all of the browser, built in popup blacking (which IE then
copied). Plus, the web developers plugin - which your obviously not
using. Seriously, try it - you wont even swtich back. FF is no flash in
the pand - IE is looking about .5% a month to FF.


> Can somebody please design something NEW and innovative for a change?


Such as? We're just talking browsers here. The market will only take so
much innovation.

> But perhaps you didn't notice that cute little windows logo when you have it
> open huh?
> Looks like Bill Gates and company is trying to enter the real world of
> surfing.


Mozilla Org (FireFox) have to compete with IE. Better to design
something users are familia with rather than reinventing the wheel.
People are frightened of change.

> As usual, with "stolen" goods.


FireFox has lots of inovative features. IE does nothing other than
browse, and it does THAT really badly (the slowest of the browsers, the
one that least respects the standards, the one with the most rendering
engine bugs, the one that has to be patched once a month because of
security scares).

You really need to expand on what you meant, because sound slike you're
trolling a bit, or simply haven't tried FF.

--


x theSpaceGirl (miranda)

# lead designer @ http://www.dhnewmedia.com #
# remove NO SPAM to email, or use form on website #
 
Reply With Quote
 
SpaceGirl
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      12-18-2004
Hywel Jenkins wrote:
> In article <>, Anonymous@127.001 says...
>
>> SpaceGirl wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Richard wrote:
>>>
>>>> Richard wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>http://geocities.com/r_bullis/test3.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>I've managed to get to this point.
>>>>>Problem is, I get an error saying that an item is not defined as an
>>>>>object. When clicked on, the link should activate the first layer and
>>>>>does not. I'm just following what the original script was using. Could be
>>>>>a simple placement of the division tag.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Any ideas on how to correct appreciated.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Found out I didn't end the script tag properly which caused the error.
>>>>Still does not move the new layer into the window.
>>>>
>>>>

>>
>>>Have you even tried validating this? Or, try running it in FireFox.
>>>FireFox instantly tells you that there's an object missing in it's
>>>JavaScript console. There's something badly wrong with your scripts.

>>
>>>Validate your code. Test it in a modern browser that has a proper
>>>javascript console (like FireFox).

>>
>>Beleive it or not, my latest local version actually validates!
>>
>>So somewhere I've got a variable that ain't working right.
>>
>>Firefox? Oh please. Not yet another IE look alike.

>
>
> RTS, you still have no idea, do you? Please explain why Firefox is an
> IE look alike.
>
>
>
>>Can somebody please design something NEW and innovative for a change?

>
>
> You mean like the Mozilla Foundation has done?
>
>
>
>>But perhaps you didn't notice that cute little windows logo when you have it
>>open huh?

>
>
> What are you wittering on about Stupid?
>
>


He means the little spinning logo in the top right hand corner. What he
totally misses is that back in the early 90s, Netscape (who spawned
Mozilla and the whole open source browser market) had their little logo
spinning in the top right corner YEARS before Micorosft even HAD a web
browser. If anyone copied anyone it was Microsoft, but now FF is here
and IE is looking pretty weak.

--


x theSpaceGirl (miranda)

# lead designer @ http://www.dhnewmedia.com #
# remove NO SPAM to email, or use form on website #
 
Reply With Quote
 
Hywel Jenkins
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      12-18-2004
In article <>,
says...
> >>But perhaps you didn't notice that cute little windows logo when you have it
> >>open huh?

> >
> >
> > What are you wittering on about Stupid?
> >
> >

>
> He means the little spinning logo in the top right hand corner.


I don't have a spinning logo. Mine rotates.

--
Hywel http://kibo.org.uk/
I do not eat quiche.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Disco Octopus
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      12-18-2004
Richard expressed precisely :
> SpaceGirl wrote:
>
>> Richard wrote:
>>> Richard wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> http://geocities.com/r_bullis/test3.html
>>>
>>>
>>>> I've managed to get to this point.
>>>> Problem is, I get an error saying that an item is not defined as an
>>>> object. When clicked on, the link should activate the first layer and
>>>> does not. I'm just following what the original script was using. Could be
>>>> a simple placement of the division tag.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Any ideas on how to correct appreciated.
>>>
>>>
>>> Found out I didn't end the script tag properly which caused the error.
>>> Still does not move the new layer into the window.
>>>
>>>

>
>> Have you even tried validating this? Or, try running it in FireFox.
>> FireFox instantly tells you that there's an object missing in it's
>> JavaScript console. There's something badly wrong with your scripts.

>
>> Validate your code. Test it in a modern browser that has a proper
>> javascript console (like FireFox).

>
> Beleive it or not, my latest local version actually validates!
>
> So somewhere I've got a variable that ain't working right.
>
> Firefox? Oh please. Not yet another IE look alike.
> Can somebody please design something NEW and innovative for a change?
> But perhaps you didn't notice that cute little windows logo when you have it
> open huh?
> Looks like Bill Gates and company is trying to enter the real world of
> surfing.
> As usual, with "stolen" goods.


this post really makes you look a bit stupid richard.

--
This is an automatic signature of MesNews.
Site : http://www.mesnews.net

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
my module and unittest contend over commandline options... chrisber Python 1 05-02-2008 08:06 PM
Contend Switch estebangbrown@gmail.com Cisco 0 10-13-2005 10:37 PM
One fixed....new snag to contend with Richard Javascript 33 12-19-2004 09:21 PM
HDD snag king doodle squat Computer Support 5 02-05-2004 02:12 AM
virtual memory snag king doodle squat Computer Support 10 01-26-2004 11:28 PM



Advertisments