«

I rely heavily on MSDN for documentation when it comes to
HTML/DHTML/JavaScript/CSS but as a result I often have problems getting my
stuff to work in Netscape/Mozilla/Firefox. I like the MSDN online
documentation
(http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/de...uthor/dhtml/re
ference/objects.asp) because it has complete lists of DHTML objects,
properties, methods, collections and event and for each element you can
easily view all the applicable attributes/propertes, behaviors, collections,
events, filters, methods, objects and styles. And it is a all very well
cross-referenced so for example if you are looking at an event you can see
all the elements that it applies to.

Is there any online equivalent for Mozilla/Geko based browsers?

I have explored the Gecko DOM reference at
http://www.mozilla.org/docs/dom/domref but frankly this sucks. I cannot find
a complete list of all HTML elements and all attributes/properties, methods,
events, styles etc. I'm thinking there has got to be some decent
documentation like that on MSDN out there., can anybody point me in the
right direction?

In alt.html,alt.html.dhtml Aidan said:

> I cannot find a complete list of all HTML elements and all
> attributes/properties, methods, events, styles etc. I'm thinking
> there has got to be some decent documentation like that on MSDN out
> there., can anybody point me in the right direction?

cascading style sheets, level 2 specification
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/
cascading style sheets, level 2 revision 1 Candidate Recommendation
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/
master compatibility charts:
http://centricle.com/ref/css/filters/
http://www.blooberry.com/indexdot/css/index.html
http://macedition.com/cb/resources/a...sssupport.html
old:
http://www.immix.net/html/CSSGuide.htm
http://devedge.netscape.com/library/...3/css-support/
opera support: http://www.opera.com/docs/specs/css/
HTML 4.01 Specification:
http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/






--
the facts and opinions expressed by brucies
l i t t l e v o i c e s
are not necessarily the same as those held by brucie.

On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 10:25:36 +1000, brucie <****@usenetshit.info> wrote:

[snip]

> http://devedge.netscape.com/library/...3/css-support/

That link's dead now. You could always use the Wayback Machine for the
time being:
<URL:http://web.archive.org/web/20040202055733/http://devedge.netscape.com/library/xref/2003/css-support/>.

[snip]

I suppose you should also add the W3C DOM Recommendations:
<URL:http://www.w3.org/DOM/DOMTR>.

Mike

--
Michael Winter
Replace ".invalid" with ".uk" to reply by e-mail.

Thanks for the response. http://www.blooberry.com/indexdot/html/index2.htm
looks a bit like the type of thing I am looking for but unfortunately this
one is more than a year out of date, I need to see what is supported in the
latest browsers such as Firefox 1.0. I am not looking for seperate
stand-alone CSS docs, what I need is a complete and comprehensive
cross-reference for element, attributes/properties, methods, events and
styles supported by Mozilla based browsers. I'm thinking there has got to be
something like this out there? I've used Danny Goodman's JavaScript Bible
for a few years now but I need something more up to date and online. MSDN is
excellent for IE, I really want an MSDN equivalent for Mozilla based
browsers, surely there's got to be some decent documentation online?

In alt.html,alt.html.dhtml Aidan said:

> I need to see what is supported in the
> latest browsers such as Firefox 1.0.

that nice

What is the accepted way to share a message across multiple newsgroups?
http://smjg.port5.com/faqs/usenet/xpost.html


--
the facts and opinions expressed by brucies
l i t t l e v o i c e s
are not necessarily the same as those held by brucie.

Aidan wrote:
> Thanks for the response. http://www.blooberry.com/indexdot/html/index2.htm
> looks a bit like the type of thing I am looking for but unfortunately this
> one is more than a year out of date, I need to see what is supported in the
> latest browsers such as Firefox 1.0. I am not looking for seperate
> stand-alone CSS docs, what I need is a complete and comprehensive
> cross-reference for element, attributes/properties, methods, events and
> styles supported by Mozilla based browsers. I'm thinking there has got to be
> something like this out there? I've used Danny Goodman's JavaScript Bible
> for a few years now but I need something more up to date and online. MSDN is
> excellent for IE, I really want an MSDN equivalent for Mozilla based
> browsers, surely there's got to be some decent documentation online?
>
>
>


Hmmm but FireFox is written to render the W3C standards, not arbitary
in-house stuff like MS does with IE. So, your point of reference should
be w3c. FireFox's DOM is pretty strict, and sticks to the standards
pretty well. Which is why you dont need an MSDN for FireFox...

Anyway, O'Reilly do some great CSS ref books. Use them.

--


x theSpaceGirl (miranda)

# lead designer @ http://www.dhnewmedia.com #
# remove NO SPAM to email, or use form on website #

"SpaceGirl" <> wrote in message
news:...

> Hmmm but FireFox is written to render the W3C standards, not arbitary
> in-house stuff like MS does with IE. So, your point of reference should
> be w3c. FireFox's DOM is pretty strict, and sticks to the standards
> pretty well. Which is why you dont need an MSDN for FireFox...
>
> Anyway, O'Reilly do some great CSS ref books. Use them.

OK, I've concluded that the documentation I'm looking for does not exist.
The W3C stuff is more of a spec than a developers reference so it is to
difficult to find what I need. Love or hate MS, they have got some very user
friendly documentation for IE, I just wish there was something like this for
mozzilla or generic W3C DHTML. Also I was thinking that the different
versions of mozilla/gecko have differences in what they support so they
would not tie in exactly to the generic W3C standard. I think there is a
major need for some a good online reference that cross-references all the
technologies/standards and makes it easy for developers to find what they
need without having to sift through a bunch of different sources.

Aidan wrote:
> "SpaceGirl" <> wrote in message
> news:...
>
>
>>Hmmm but FireFox is written to render the W3C standards, not arbitary
>>in-house stuff like MS does with IE. So, your point of reference should
>>be w3c. FireFox's DOM is pretty strict, and sticks to the standards
>>pretty well. Which is why you dont need an MSDN for FireFox...
>>
>>Anyway, O'Reilly do some great CSS ref books. Use them.
>
>
> OK, I've concluded that the documentation I'm looking for does not exist.
> The W3C stuff is more of a spec than a developers reference so it is to
> difficult to find what I need. Love or hate MS, they have got some very user
> friendly documentation for IE, I just wish there was something like this for
> mozzilla or generic W3C DHTML. Also I was thinking that the different
> versions of mozilla/gecko have differences in what they support so they
> would not tie in exactly to the generic W3C standard. I think there is a
> major need for some a good online reference that cross-references all the
> technologies/standards and makes it easy for developers to find what they
> need without having to sift through a bunch of different sources.
>
>

www.w3schools.com is THE place to learn stuff if you get stuck.
www.alistapart.com is also a great reference.

--


x theSpaceGirl (miranda)

# lead designer @ http://www.dhnewmedia.com #
# remove NO SPAM to email, or use form on website #

SpaceGirl wrote:
> www.w3schools.com is THE place to learn stuff if you get stuck.

No, it really isn't. To quote from page 1 of their "Learn to use HTML"
section.

> How does the browser fetch the pages?
>
> * A browser fetches a Web page from a server by a request.

Yes, and I get books by placing an order at Amazon. (Lets ignore the bit
where Amazon finds the books, packages them up, gives them to the post
office, and they bring them to my office where I have to walk down to the
collection shelves and pick them up.

This also fails to take into account that most webpages are made up of more
then one resource (images, style sheets, JavaScripts, etc) so the browser
has to make multiple requests.

> * A request is a standard HTTP request containing a page address.

Not according to the w3s definition of page address. An HTTP 1.0 request
will include the protocol and part parts of the URI, and HTTP 1.1 request
will unclude the authority part as well. A request for
"http://www.someone.com/page.htm" will look something like:

GET /page.htm HTTP/1.0

or

GET /page.htm HTTP/1.1
Host: www.someone.com

So the http gets the case trasformed, the "://" is lost, the authority might
be dropped entirely and the remaining parts appear in a different order
with other data in between. The "page address" doesn't actually appear at
all.

> * A page address looks like this: http://www.someone.com/page.htm.

I've never see this called a "page address" before. "URI" - yes. "URL" -
yes. "Address" - yes. Not "page address" though.

> How does the browser display the pages?
>
> * All Web pages contain instructions for display

No they don't. An HTML 4.01 Strict document with no style sheet is very
unlikely to include any information about how to display it. Not that there
are any instructions anyway. The markup provides semantic information, the
style sheet provides presentational hints.

> * The browser displays the page by reading these instructions.

.... and processing them, etc etc.

> * The most common display instructions are called HTML tags.

.... which should not be used for presentation.

> * HTML tags look like this <p>This is a Paragraph</p>.

No, that looks more like an element. It consists of two tags and some text.

> Who is making the Web standards?
>
> * The Web standards are not made up by Netscape or Microsoft.

http://w3.org/Consortium/Member/List - err... Microsoft is on the list.

> * The rule-making body of the Web is the W3C.

The W3C produces Recommendations, not Rules.

> * W3C stands for the World Wide Web Consortium.

Amazing! They got something right!

> * W3C puts together specifications for Web standards.
> * The most essential Web standards are HTML, CSS and XML.

Opinion (and not one I agree with).

> * The latest HTML standard is XHTML 1.0.

No, its HTML 4.01. The W3C are pretty clear that XHTML is a replacement for
HTML, not a new version of it.

.... and that is just on the first page of their tutorial! Its a sad fact
that there are no really good online HTML tutorials at present. Its
probably best to stick to the specification (which is really pretty
readable).

--
David Dorward <http://blog.dorward.me.uk/> <http://dorward.me.uk/>
Home is where the ~/.bashrc is

David Dorward wrote:

> ... and that is just on the first page of their tutorial! Its a sad fact
> that there are no really good online HTML tutorials at present.

That's not entirely true. Blowing my own trumpet, I started work on what I
felt was a good HTML tutorial a couple of years or so ago, back when I
thought there were "no really good online HTML tutorials at present".

http://tobyinkster.co.uk/html-tutorial

It's not entirely finished yet, but getting there. It starts with the
philosophy of HTML; then takes the reader through a simple worked example
marking up a short document and introducing a few basic elements (HTML,
HEAD, BODY, H1-H6, P, IMG, A, DIV, SPAN, TITLE, LINK and META); then
introduces the concept of stylesheets, though doesn't go into too much
detail; then touches on entities; then goes through lists (UL, OL, DL,
DD, DT, LI), inline semantic elements (EM, STRONG, ABBR, Q, etc), layout
elements (PRE, BR), horizontal rules, block semantic elements (ADDRESS,
BLOCKQUOTE) and tables.

When it's finished, it will contain a more complete worked example and
links to other valuable resources.

Since I started writing the tutorial though, I have discovered that there
are decent HTML tutorials out there. Two that I like are:

- http://www.htmldog.com/
- http://tranchant.plus.com/web/html-tutorial/

--
Toby A Inkster BSc (Hons) ARCS
Contact Me ~ http://tobyinkster.co.uk/contact