«

In alt.html Deryck said:

> I dont suppose you have a fix/hack/kludge for the
> IE-doesnt-support-min-width problem do you Brucie?

never bothered looking for one. do people still use IE?


--


v o i c e s

"Deryck" <> wrote in message
news:...
>
> "brucie" <****@usenetshit.info> wrote in message
> news:181mehxun16ve$....
>> In alt.html T.J. said:
>>
>>>> min-width:whatever; on the element you want to restrict.
>>
> I dont suppose you have a fix/hack/kludge for the
> IE-doesnt-support-min-width problem do you Brucie? One that doesnt
> involves javascript?
>
> Hoping,
>
>
> Deryck
>

Cheating I know ;o) but this works in IE
<img src="whiteline.jpg" height="0" width="550" alt="">

Deryck wrote:

>
> "brucie" <****@usenetshit.info> wrote in message
> news:181mehxun16ve$....
>> In alt.html T.J. said:
>>
>>>> min-width:whatever; on the element you want to restrict.
>>
> I dont suppose you have a fix/hack/kludge for the
> IE-doesnt-support-min-width problem do you Brucie? One that doesnt
> involves javascript?

There's one that goes along the lines of:

body {
width:500px;
}

html>body {
width:auto;
min-width:500px;
}

all to do with ie not recognising child selectors and treating width as
min-width. I can't say how effective it is though.

--
frostie
http://brightonfixedodds.net

"brucie" <****@usenetshit.info> wrote in message
news:...
>
>> I dont suppose you have a fix/hack/kludge for the
>> IE-doesnt-support-min-width problem do you Brucie?
>
> never bothered looking for one. do people still use IE?
>
Fraid so, about 95% of them apparently

"Robert Frost-Bridges" <> wrote in message
news:...
>
> There's one that goes along the lines of:
>
> body {
> width:500px;
> }
>
> html>body {
> width:auto;
> min-width:500px;
> }
>
> all to do with ie not recognising child selectors and treating width as
> min-width. I can't say how effective it is though.
>
Thanks Frostie. Yes Ive seen that one. I think it means that you lose the
functionality of width in IE though.