«

I dont think that it really matters, but just for my own reference?

I found a calendar component tutorial online for html components.
in this component the tag for a script was <SCRIPT
LANGUAGE="JavaScript"></SCRIPT>

here is the problem when i tried this in my own component it would not work
until i used the tag like this
<SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript"></SCRIPT>

i could understand why this would not work on different browsers but the
calendar project works just fine on my computer so
i dont understand why it did nto work in my project. Is this stuff case
sensitive????

Thanks for the help

WStoreyII

"WStoreyII" <> wrote in message
news:za3Ec.4248$ ...
> I dont think that it really matters, but just for my own reference?
>
> I found a calendar component tutorial online for html components.
> in this component the tag for a script was <SCRIPT
> LANGUAGE="JavaScript"></SCRIPT>

The language attribute is deprecated.

> here is the problem when i tried this in my own component it would not
work
> until i used the tag like this
> <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript"></SCRIPT>

The type attribute is now required for the script element.

> i could understand why this would not work on different browsers but the
> calendar project works just fine on my computer so
> i dont understand why it did nto work in my project.

Different error correction?

> Is this stuff case
> sensitive????

HTML is not case sensitive.

--
Cheers
Richard.

then how come it worked when i loaded the calendar example and not on mine?

ill send the demo if you wish

wstoreyii
"rf" <> wrote in message
news:Oh3Ec.69462$...
>
> "WStoreyII" <> wrote in message
> news:za3Ec.4248$ ...
> > I dont think that it really matters, but just for my own reference?
> >
> > I found a calendar component tutorial online for html components.
> > in this component the tag for a script was <SCRIPT
> > LANGUAGE="JavaScript"></SCRIPT>
>
> The language attribute is deprecated.
>
> > here is the problem when i tried this in my own component it would not
> work
> > until i used the tag like this
> > <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript"></SCRIPT>
>
> The type attribute is now required for the script element.
>
> > i could understand why this would not work on different browsers but the
> > calendar project works just fine on my computer so
> > i dont understand why it did nto work in my project.
>
> Different error correction?
>
> > Is this stuff case
> > sensitive????
>
> HTML is not case sensitive.
>
> --
> Cheers
> Richard.
>
>

rf wrote:

> HTML is not case sensitive.

Bits of it are. Compare <strong>Hello</strong> with <strong>HELLO</strong>.

--
Toby A Inkster BSc (Hons) ARCS
Contact Me - http://www.goddamn.co.uk/tobyink/?page=132

On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 06:25:51 +0100, Toby A Inkster
<> declared in
alt.html,comp.lang.javascript,microsoft.public.dot net.framework.aspnet:
> rf wrote:
>
>> HTML is not case sensitive.
>
> Bits of it are. Compare <strong>Hello</strong> with <strong>HELLO</strong>.

That's the content, not the HTML.

--
Mark Parnell
http://www.clarkecomputers.com.au
"Never drink rum&coke whilst reading usenet" - rf 2004

"Toby A Inkster" <> wrote in message
news. ..
> rf wrote:
>
> > HTML is not case sensitive.
>
<nitpick>
> Bits of it are. Compare <strong>Hello</strong> with
<strong>HELLO</strong>.
</nitpick>

<pedantic>
HTML is not case sensitive.

The content whose structure the HTML describes may be case sensitive in
certain languages (such as English) where there is such a thing as case
(unlike other languages, such as most South East Asian ones (and especially
Chinese and its derivatives (where there are not even any "letters")) where
there is no concept corresponding to upper and lower case) but the HTML bit
(the stuff inside the start and end tags, the attributes and so on) is not,
with the exception of the value of some of the attributes, such as in the
case of href="example.com" where "example.com" may or may not be case
sensitive depending on which operating system the server is running, however
one could actually argue that the "example.com" bit is actually part of the
content, even though it does not appear as content within an element but
rather as the value of an attribute.
</pedantic>

--
Cheers
Richard.

"rf" <> wrote in message
newsZ7Ec.69677$...
>
> "Toby A Inkster" <> wrote in message
> news. ..
> > rf wrote:
> >
> > > HTML is not case sensitive.
> >
> <nitpick>
> > Bits of it are. Compare <strong>Hello</strong> with
> <strong>HELLO</strong>.
> </nitpick>
>
> <pedantic> // What is Pedantic???????
> HTML is not case sensitive.
>
> The content whose structure the HTML describes may be case sensitive in
> certain languages (such as English) where there is such a thing as case
> (unlike other languages, such as most South East Asian ones (and
especially
> Chinese and its derivatives (where there are not even any "letters"))
where
> there is no concept corresponding to upper and lower case) but the HTML
bit
> (the stuff inside the start and end tags, the attributes and so on) is
not,
> with the exception of the value of some of the attributes, such as in the
> case of href="example.com" where "example.com" may or may not be case
> sensitive depending on which operating system the server is running,
however
> one could actually argue that the "example.com" bit is actually part of
the
> content, even though it does not appear as content within an element but
> rather as the value of an attribute.
> </pedantic>
>
> --
> Cheers
> Richard.
>
>

"WStoreyII" <> wrote in message
news:Yp4Ec.79128$. com...
> then how come it worked when i loaded the calendar example and not on
mine?
>
> ill send the demo if you wish

Er, send it where?

Provide a link to the demo and a link to your implementation.

--
Cheers
Richard.

rf wrote:


>>i could understand why this would not work on different browsers but the
>>calendar project works just fine on my computer so
>>i dont understand why it did nto work in my project.
>
>
> Different error correction?
>
>
>>Is this stuff case
>>sensitive????
>
>
> HTML is not case sensitive.
>


XHTML is tho.

--


x theSpaceGirl (miranda)

# lead designer @ http://www.dhnewmedia.com #
# remove NO SPAM to email, or use form on website #

rf wrote:
> <pedantic>
> The content whose structure the HTML describes may be case sensitive in
> certain languages (such as English) where there is such a thing as case
> (unlike other languages, such as most South East Asian ones (and especially
> Chinese and its derivatives (where there are not even any "letters")) where
> there is no concept corresponding to upper and lower case) but the HTML bit
> (the stuff inside the start and end tags, the attributes and so on) is not,
> with the exception of the value of some of the attributes, such as in the
> case of href="example.com" where "example.com" may or may not be case
> sensitive depending on which operating system the server is running, however
> one could actually argue that the "example.com" bit is actually part of the
> content, even though it does not appear as content within an element but
> rather as the value of an attribute.
> </pedantic>

Wow, that's one long sentence!

<nitpick>
Whether a link is case-sensitive may depend on operating system, but it
doesn't have to. A server can just as easily be configured to show the
same page for every URL, or show a different one based on the first
letter of the file name and nothing else; there's no requirment to map
URLs on to real files, although that's normally done.
</nitpick>