Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Programming > HTML > Embedding a Graphic Instead of using <img src="...">

Reply
Thread Tools

Embedding a Graphic Instead of using <img src="...">

 
 
Kris
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      02-19-2004
In article <(E-Mail Removed)>,
Whitecrest <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

> > I believe it was never said "don't use JavaScript" without adding "to
> > rely your site on".....

>
> Your reading way too much into what I wrote, I was speaking in general
> terms, an observation of behaviour in the group if you will.


No offense taken.

> David (and others that offered this solution) takes the stand, "don't
> use javascript".


I concur. I remember them saying all the time "Don't rely on JavaScript
to furfil critical site functionality". Same goes for CSS or any other
optionality.

> Why? Because 15% of the people browsing will not be
> able to use it for one reason or another.


Which does not need to be a problem.

> And give or take a percent or
> two, they are absolutely right.


They are, assuming you mean what I repeated above.

> I was commenting on how interesting it was that someone with that
> viewpoint would offer a solution that would not work in 90% of the
> browsers out there, but did not offer a similar warning (or repetitive
> links) about how bad it would be and how you would be discriminating
> against millions..


Serving content in .avi format will also not work for millions. Often I
find a link that also serves the same content as .mov and .mpeg, which
helps out a lot.

Sometimes, I add CSS in my print style sheets that only functions
properly in some advanced browsers, like Opera and Mozilla. I realise
that this is serving a marginal group, but also that it is not harming
the others. I think that thought is key.

>. (Again I am speaking in general not of any
> individual.)


It is the approach that has my interest, not the individuals connected
to this thread.

> The OP's problem has been answered. Several have offered a solution
> that will work on a percentage of browsers. Now they have to make a
> choice.


It may not have to be a choice between one or the other. The advice
people have given can help the OP to form a good perspective on what is
possible and make effective combinations.

> The lady or the tiger. (That is a reference to a story about
> choices in case one was wondering.)


I will Google for it, thanks.

--
Kris
<(E-Mail Removed)> (nl)
<http://www.cinnamon.nl/>
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
David Dorward
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      02-19-2004
Whitecrest wrote:
> If losing less than 15% because of javascript is a bad idea,


Only if you _depend_ on it.

> how can someone justify using something that doesn't work in 90% of the
> browsers?


I don't, and I don't suggest using it, hence the warning about browser
support.

It was offered as a technology that is technically interesting, if not one
that is all that useful in the context of the www.

--
David Dorward <http://dorward.me.uk/>
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
problem in using asp.net stream graphic and image miladhatam@gmail.com ASP .Net 5 09-12-2008 08:39 AM
problem in using asp.net stream graphic and image miladhatam@gmail.com ASP .Net Web Controls 0 09-11-2008 01:18 PM
Using JavaScript to Customize Mouse Pointer Graphic?? Prisoner at War Javascript 5 04-20-2008 11:16 PM
Is it possible to mouseover a GRAPHIC . . . that launches another (freestanding) GRAPHIC (ie. when flash is _not_ available)? 50 SOMETHING GAL HTML 3 12-10-2006 01:10 AM
Using VB.Net or C#, utilizing the clipboard object, how to copy an MS Excel graphic from the clipboard to an image control and obtain its source reference TC ASP .Net 5 09-01-2004 04:49 AM



Advertisments