fixed

OK i fixed the file problem, and changed the colors out. Is the colors ok?
The errors on the page will go bye bye as soon as i get a replacement. I
hope. The only link that works on the left is the Help for 95.



http://www.learningpc4beginners.com

Ghostmaster

Ghostmaster <running-> kirjoitti Wed, 07 Jan 2004 11:18:33 GMT:

> OK i fixed the file problem, and changed the colors out. Is the colors
> ok?
> The errors on the page will go bye bye as soon as i get a replacement. I
> hope. The only link that works on the left is the Help for 95.
>
>
>
> http://www.learningpc4beginners.com

IE5.5 and Firebird displayed it the way you probably have in your mind, but
viewing with Opera 7.11 makes the layout look a bit odd:
1/3 screenwidth for left navigation panel, 1/3 for the content and 1/3
width for ads on the right side.
I don't know if these are errors you referred to.
Contrasts in the navigation hurt my eyes and you have a lot of black text
on a dark green background, which is turns me away pretty soon.

Oll¡maX!

"OllimaX" <> wrote in message
news...
: Ghostmaster <running-> kirjoitti Wed, 07 Jan 2004 11:18:33
GMT:
:
: > OK i fixed the file problem, and changed the colors out. Is the colors
: > ok?
: > The errors on the page will go bye bye as soon as i get a replacement.
I
: > hope. The only link that works on the left is the Help for 95.
: >
: >
: >
: > http://www.learningpc4beginners.zl6
:
: IE5.5 and Firebird displayed it the way you probably have in your mind,
but
: viewing with Opera 7.11 makes the layout look a bit odd:
: 1/3 screenwidth for left navigation panel, 1/3 for the content and 1/3
: width for ads on the right side.
: I don't know if these are errors you referred to.
: Contrasts in the navigation hurt my eyes and you have a lot of black text
: on a dark green background, which is turns me away pretty soon.
:
: Oll¡maX!

I may be taking out that right panel. I am also going to change the colors
(all of them) But I have to do it later, I am fixing to take off here for
a while. I might use #FFFFCC that is yellow it is light in color and
#FFE6CC this is like a light peach brown but more brown than peach. both
are light, and not rough on the eyes.

Unless I find something else.

I changed it. I guess it looks better. Lets just say I am not that
impressed. http://learningpc4beginners.com I toned it down. I didn't
go with the colors I said I was going with.

Ghostmaster wrote:
> I changed it. I guess it looks better. Lets just say I am not that
> impressed. http://learningpc4beginners.com I toned it down. I
> didn't go with the colors I said I was going with.

your page is missing a double wuote in the source.

"Disco Octopus" <> wrote in message
news:nW0Lb.1789$...
: Ghostmaster wrote:
: > I changed it. I guess it looks better. Lets just say I am not that
: > impressed. http://learningpc4beginners.com I toned it down. I
: > didn't go with the colors I said I was going with.
:
: your page is missing a double wuote in the source.
:
:

double wuote ?????????????

Ghostmaster wrote:
> "Disco Octopus" <> wrote in message
> news:nW0Lb.1789$...
>> Ghostmaster wrote:
>>> I changed it. I guess it looks better. Lets just say I am not that
>>> impressed. http://learningpc4beginners.com I toned it down. I
>>> didn't go with the colors I said I was going with.
>>
>> your page is missing a double wuote in the source.
>>
>>
>
> double wuote ?????????????

double quote "

in the first line

"Disco Octopus" <> wrote in
news:LO2Lb.1790$:

>>> your page is missing a double wuote in the source.
>>
>> double wuote ?????????????
>
> double quote "
>
> in the first line

A "double wuote," OTOH, is one of the possible units that a browser might
assume for a CSS length value written without a unit. If the browser has
run out of hobnobs, it might interpret "width: 50;" as "50 double wuotes
wide."

in news:Xns946A6AF57FA2ebohlmanomsdevcom@130.133.1.4,
Eric Bohlman typed:
> "Disco Octopus" <> wrote in
> news:LO2Lb.1790$:
>
>>>> your page is missing a double wuote in the source.
>>>
>>> double wuote ?????????????
>>
>> double quote "
>>
>> in the first line
>
> A "double wuote," OTOH, is one of the possible units that a browser
> might assume for a CSS length value written without a unit. If the
> browser has run out of hobnobs, it might interpret "width: 50;" as
> "50 double wuotes wide."

right. ok. well, there is only one double wuote missing. it is (or should
be) on the end of the top line (line that defines the doctype)

in news:jbcLb.204$,
Disco Octopus typed:
> in news:Xns946A6AF57FA2ebohlmanomsdevcom@130.133.1.4,
> Eric Bohlman typed:
>> "Disco Octopus" <> wrote in
>> news:LO2Lb.1790$:
>>
>>>>> your page is missing a double wuote in the source.
>>>>
>>>> double wuote ?????????????
>>>
>>> double quote "
>>>
>>> in the first line
>>
>> A "double wuote," OTOH, is one of the possible units that a browser
>> might assume for a CSS length value written without a unit. If the
>> browser has run out of hobnobs, it might interpret "width: 50;" as
>> "50 double wuotes wide."
>
> right. ok. well, there is only one double wuote missing. it is (or
> should be) on the end of the top line (line that defines the doctype)

actually. you know what. dont bother. this page is extrememly messed up, and
I am surprised that (even in IE5.5) it displays anything at all.

you really need to get it valid 4.01 before you make any more looky-feely
changes.