«

www.1-large-world.com/div2.html

At least now in netscrape 4.7 it almost looks decent.

Yes I am using pixels because that's the way I want it.

In article <>,
says...
> www.1-large-world.com/div2.html
>
> At least now in netscrape 4.7 it almost looks decent.
>
> Yes I am using pixels because that's the way I want it.

Again, stop - you're rubbish:
http://demo.hyweljenkins.co.uk/richard.jpg (28k)

--
Hywel I do not eat quiche
http://hyweljenkins.co.uk/
http://hyweljenkins.co.uk/mfaq.php

Hywel Jenkins wrote:

> In article <>,
> says...
>> www.1-large-world.com/div2.html

>> At least now in netscrape 4.7 it almost looks decent.

>> Yes I am using pixels because that's the way I want it.

> Again, stop - you're rubbish:
> http://demo.hyweljenkins.co.uk/richard.jpg (28k)

What the hell are you using? What ever it is I'd consider getting a better
browser.



> --
> Hywel I do not eat quiche
> http://hyweljenkins.co.uk/
> http://hyweljenkins.co.uk/mfaq.php

In article <>,
"Richard" <> wrote:

> >> www.1-large-world.com/div2.html
>
> >> At least now in netscrape 4.7 it almost looks decent.
>
> >> Yes I am using pixels because that's the way I want it.
>
> > Again, stop - you're rubbish:
> > http://demo.hyweljenkins.co.uk/richard.jpg (28k)
>
> What the hell are you using? What ever it is I'd consider getting a better
> browser.

I see the exact same thing in my Safari1.0/Mac OS 10.2.8.
Before Panther (Mac OS 10.3) came out, several weeks ago, that happened
to be the most modern webbrowser on the world's most advanced operating
system. How can that get any better?

(yeah, I know, I should buy Panther)

--
Kris
erlands (nl)

In article <>,
says...
> Hywel Jenkins wrote:
>
> > In article <>,
> > says...
> >> www.1-large-world.com/div2.html
>
> >> At least now in netscrape 4.7 it almost looks decent.
>
> >> Yes I am using pixels because that's the way I want it.
>
> > Again, stop - you're rubbish:
> > http://demo.hyweljenkins.co.uk/richard.jpg (28k)
>
> What the hell are you using?

Mozilla Firebird 0.7 or Mozilla 1.5. You're typical of most amateurs
that think they're any good: you use Internet Explorer and you deisgn
specifically for it.

> What ever it is I'd consider getting a better
> browser.

And if I was your customer I'd consider getting a better web developer.
Inn fact, I'd be considering getting *a* web developer.

--
Hywel I do not eat quiche
http://hyweljenkins.co.uk/
http://hyweljenkins.co.uk/mfaq.php

Kris wrote:

> In article <>,

> "Richard" <> wrote:

>> >> www.1-large-world.com/div2.html

>> >> At least now in netscrape 4.7 it almost looks decent.

>> >> Yes I am using pixels because that's the way I want it.

>> > Again, stop - you're rubbish:
>> > http://demo.hyweljenkins.co.uk/richard.jpg (28k)

>> What the hell are you using? What ever it is I'd consider getting a better
>> browser.

> I see the exact same thing in my Safari1.0/Mac OS 10.2.8.
> Before Panther (Mac OS 10.3) came out, several weeks ago, that happened
> to be the most modern webbrowser on the world's most advanced operating
> system. How can that get any better?

Same thing, here, in Mozilla 1.1, Opera 6.10 and Konqueror 3.0.3. Those
are the only better browsers I have.

--
Blinky - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Linux RU 297263
Microsoft, 23 Oct: "As a result of challenges to our business model,
sales of our products may decline, we may have to reduce the prices
we charge for our products..." http://snipurl.com/open_source

Kris wrote:

> I see the exact same thing in my Safari1.0/Mac OS 10.2.8.
> Before Panther (Mac OS 10.3) came out, several weeks ago, that happened
> to be the most modern webbrowser

Safari 1.0 - June 2003.

More modern:

Opera 7.21 - 14 October 2003.
Mozilla 1.5 - 15 October 2003.

--
Toby A Inkster BSc (Hons) ARCS
Contact Me - http://www.goddamn.co.uk/tobyink/?id=132

In article <>,
Toby A Inkster <> wrote:

> > I see the exact same thing in my Safari1.0/Mac OS 10.2.8.
> > Before Panther (Mac OS 10.3) came out, several weeks ago, that happened
> > to be the most modern webbrowser
>
> Safari 1.0 - June 2003.
>
> More modern:
>
> Opera 7.21 - 14 October 2003.
> Mozilla 1.5 - 15 October 2003.

Don't confuse release with upgrade or patch.

--
Kris
erlands (nl)

Hywel Jenkins wrote:

> In article <>,
> says...
>> Hywel Jenkins wrote:

>> > In article <>,
>>
>> > says...
>> >> www.1-large-world.com/div2.html

>> >> At least now in netscrape 4.7 it almost looks decent.

>> >> Yes I am using pixels because that's the way I want it.

>> > Again, stop - you're rubbish:
>> > http://demo.hyweljenkins.co.uk/richard.jpg (28k)

>> What the hell are you using?

> Mozilla Firebird 0.7 or Mozilla 1.5. You're typical of most amateurs
> that think they're any good: you use Internet Explorer and you deisgn
> specifically for it.

Bullshit. You can have your fun all you want.
Here's what I see in mozilla 1.5 with 1024x768.
www.1-large-world.com/div2a.jpg
even at 800x600 it was still the same thing.
BTW, I just downloaded the latest version.

>> What ever it is I'd consider getting a better
>> browser.

> And if I was your customer I'd consider getting a better web
> developer.
> Inn fact, I'd be considering getting *a* web developer.

> --
> Hywel I do not eat quiche
> http://hyweljenkins.co.uk/
> http://hyweljenkins.co.uk/mfaq.php

"Richard" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Hywel Jenkins wrote:
>
> > In article <>,
> > says...
> >> Hywel Jenkins wrote:
>
> >> > Again, stop - you're rubbish:
> >> > http://demo.hyweljenkins.co.uk/richard.jpg (28k)
>
> >> What the hell are you using?
>
> > Mozilla Firebird 0.7 or Mozilla 1.5. You're typical of most amateurs
> > that think they're any good: you use Internet Explorer and you deisgn
> > specifically for it.
>
> Bullshit. You can have your fun all you want.
> Here's what I see in mozilla 1.5 with 1024x768.
> www.1-large-world.com/div2a.jpg
> even at 800x600 it was still the same thing.
> BTW, I just downloaded the latest version.

Yeah, so? What happens when you scroll down? It looks exactly the same as
the image Hywel posted I'll bet, that is, broken.

If any newbie actually used this example they would be instantly back here
asking what the bloody hell is going wrong with it. It is an extreemely poor
demo, not only broken as far as good usage is concerned but broken as far as
any layout considerations are concerned. If anybody actually put some real
content into it it yould brake far more spectacularly.

Cheers
Richard.