«

Hi
I have a folder on my site that I use to practice on, I don't want robots
indexing this folder. I believe the meta tag is not as good as a robot.txt
file. I would like to use a robot.txt file but...

1. What is the syntax of the line that I write to prevent access to a folder
(the folder is called 'sefriendly' and it lives off the root folder which is
called 'www'

2. In which folder is the robot.txt file stored?

thanks

David

David Graham wrote:
> Hi
> I have a folder on my site that I use to practice on, I don't want
> robots indexing this folder. I believe the meta tag is not as good as
> a robot.txt file. I would like to use a robot.txt file but...
>
> 1. What is the syntax of the line that I write to prevent access to a
> folder (the folder is called 'sefriendly' and it lives off the root
> folder which is called 'www'

User-agent: *
Disallow: /sefriendly/

> 2. In which folder is the robot.txt file stored?
in your root - in your case, www - folder

There's lots of info at:
http://www.searchengineworld.com/cgi-bin/robotcheck.cgi
And a script that checks your robot.txt file

--
PeterMcC
If you feel that any of the above is incorrect,
inappropriate or offensive in any way,
please ignore it and accept my apologies.

"PeterMcC" <> wrote in message
news:uweLa.44927$...
> David Graham wrote:
> > Hi
> > I have a folder on my site that I use to practice on, I don't want
> > robots indexing this folder. I believe the meta tag is not as good as
> > a robot.txt file. I would like to use a robot.txt file but...
> >
> > 1. What is the syntax of the line that I write to prevent access to a
> > folder (the folder is called 'sefriendly' and it lives off the root
> > folder which is called 'www'
>
> User-agent: *
> Disallow: /sefriendly/
>
> > 2. In which folder is the robot.txt file stored?
> in your root - in your case, www - folder
>
> There's lots of info at:
> http://www.searchengineworld.com/cgi-bin/robotcheck.cgi
> And a script that checks your robot.txt file

Thanks for the link

David

"PeterMcC" <> wrote in message
news:uweLa.44927$...
> David Graham wrote:
> > Hi
> > I have a folder on my site that I use to practice on, I don't want
> > robots indexing this folder. I believe the meta tag is not as good as
> > a robot.txt file. I would like to use a robot.txt file but...
> >
> > 1. What is the syntax of the line that I write to prevent access to a
> > folder (the folder is called 'sefriendly' and it lives off the root
> > folder which is called 'www'
>
> User-agent: *
> Disallow: /sefriendly/
>

I put the robot.txt file into the www folder containing the two lines above
(exactly as you indicate i.e. on two lines) but I can still visit the site
using IE6. I thought those two lines ban access from all UA's. I have
cleared out my browsers cache in case that was what I was viewing, but that
made no difference. I will read up on this subject, but could you point out
were my thinking is a bit off here. Does the robot.txt file just ban spiders
and not browsers?

TIA
David

David Graham wrote:
> "PeterMcC" <> wrote in message
> news:uweLa.44927$...
>> David Graham wrote:
>>> Hi
>>> I have a folder on my site that I use to practice on, I don't want
>>> robots indexing this folder. I believe the meta tag is not as good
>>> as a robot.txt file. I would like to use a robot.txt file but...
>>>
>>> 1. What is the syntax of the line that I write to prevent access to
>>> a folder (the folder is called 'sefriendly' and it lives off the
>>> root folder which is called 'www'
>>
>> User-agent: *
>> Disallow: /sefriendly/
>>
>
> I put the robot.txt file into the www folder containing the two lines
> above (exactly as you indicate i.e. on two lines) but I can still
> visit the site using IE6. I thought those two lines ban access from
> all UA's. I have cleared out my browsers cache in case that was what
> I was viewing, but that made no difference. I will read up on this
> subject, but could you point out were my thinking is a bit off here.
> Does the robot.txt file just ban spiders and not browsers?

Just spiders.

--
PeterMcC
If you feel that any of the above is incorrect,
inappropriate or offensive in any way,
please ignore it and accept my apologies.

PeterMcC wrote:
> David Graham wrote:
<snip>
>> I put the robot.txt file into the www folder containing the two lines
>> above (exactly as you indicate i.e. on two lines) but I can still
>> visit the site using IE6. I thought those two lines ban access from
>> all UA's. I have cleared out my browsers cache in case that was what
>> I was viewing, but that made no difference. I will read up on this
>> subject, but could you point out were my thinking is a bit off here.
>> Does the robot.txt file just ban spiders and not browsers?
>
> Just spiders.

BTW - if you don't have a link to a page, it won't get spidered because the
spider only follows links.

If you want to have links to the page but don't want it spidering or seeing
by others, use .htaccess to password protect the directory that holds the
page.

HTH
--
PeterMcC
If you feel that any of the above is incorrect,
inappropriate or offensive in any way,
please ignore it and accept my apologies.

In article <U%gLa.1981$>,
says...
>
> "PeterMcC" <> wrote in message
> news:uweLa.44927$...
> > David Graham wrote:

> > > I have a folder on my site that I use to practice on, I don't want
> > > robots indexing this folder. I believe the meta tag is not as good as
> > > a robot.txt file. I would like to use a robot.txt file but...
....
> > User-agent: *
> > Disallow: /sefriendly/
> >
....
> Does the robot.txt file just ban spiders
> and not browsers?
>
Correct.

"PeterMcC" <> wrote in message
news:SBhLa.44961$...
> PeterMcC wrote:
> > David Graham wrote:
> <snip>
> >> I put the robot.txt file into the www folder containing the two lines
> >> above (exactly as you indicate i.e. on two lines) but I can still
> >> visit the site using IE6. I thought those two lines ban access from
> >> all UA's. I have cleared out my browsers cache in case that was what
> >> I was viewing, but that made no difference. I will read up on this
> >> subject, but could you point out were my thinking is a bit off here.
> >> Does the robot.txt file just ban spiders and not browsers?
> >
> > Just spiders.
>
> BTW - if you don't have a link to a page, it won't get spidered because
the
> spider only follows links.
>
> If you want to have links to the page but don't want it spidering or
seeing
> by others, use .htaccess to password protect the directory that holds the
> page.
>
> HTH
> --
> PeterMcC
> If you feel that any of the above is incorrect,
> inappropriate or offensive in any way,
> please ignore it and accept my apologies.

Thanks for the help. I have one more question. Google indexed one of my
practice sites, before I had a chance to use a robot.txt file. Do you know
how long it will be before Google deletes the cached version of this site
which I never intended to be indexed. The reason I ask is because the
unwanted site is competing in the search results with the site which I want
to be indexed (the unwanted site is doing better than the wanted site - I
have not yet got round to making my main site more optimised for search
engines)

TIA
David

"David Graham" <> wrote in message
news:n6eLa.339$...
> Hi
> I have a folder on my site that I use to practice on, I don't want robots
> indexing this folder. I believe the meta tag is not as good as a robot.txt
> file. I would like to use a robot.txt file but...
>
> 1. What is the syntax of the line that I write to prevent access to a
folder
> (the folder is called 'sefriendly' and it lives off the root folder which
is
> called 'www'
>
> 2. In which folder is the robot.txt file stored?
>
> thanks
>
> David
>


the file should be called robots.txt rather than robot.txt else it won't
keep any spiders out ~

Denise

"Denise Enck" <> wrote in message
news:tQiLa.69023$ thlink.net...
> "David Graham" <> wrote in message
> news:n6eLa.339$...
> > Hi
> > I have a folder on my site that I use to practice on, I don't want
robots
> > indexing this folder. I believe the meta tag is not as good as a
robot.txt
> > file. I would like to use a robot.txt file but...
> >
> > 1. What is the syntax of the line that I write to prevent access to a
> folder
> > (the folder is called 'sefriendly' and it lives off the root folder
which
> is
> > called 'www'
> >
> > 2. In which folder is the robot.txt file stored?
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > David
> >
>
>
> the file should be called robots.txt rather than robot.txt else it won't
> keep any spiders out ~
>
> Denise
>
Thanks loads - didn't know it had to have the the 's' on the name

David