Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Programming > HTML > Safe level of website degradation

Reply
Thread Tools

Safe level of website degradation

 
 
Paul F. Johnson
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      06-23-2003
Hi,

Just a seemingly small question : is there an acceptable cut off point on
how far a website is degradable to?

As it stands, yet another site I'm working on degrades as far down as to
CSS support. If you don't have CSS, the site will still work, but looks
awful. The JS and Java bits degrade to their plain states.

Is there a "safe" level to assume the majority of browsers will be able to
cope with using their pre-installed values or even if they have been
played with?

TTFN

Paul
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
rf
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      06-23-2003

"Paul F. Johnson" <> wrote in message
news ...
> Hi,
>
> Just a seemingly small question : is there an acceptable cut off point on
> how far a website is degradable to?
>
> As it stands, yet another site I'm working on degrades as far down as to
> CSS support. If you don't have CSS, the site will still work, but looks
> awful. The JS and Java bits degrade to their plain states.
>
> Is there a "safe" level to assume the majority of browsers will be able to
> cope with using their pre-installed values or even if they have been
> played with?


Download a copy of Lynx (text only browser).

It gives you an idea of what a blind person will hear and what a search
engine spider will see.

Cheers
Richard.


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Headless
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      06-24-2003
"Paul F. Johnson" <> wrote:

>As it stands, yet another site I'm working on degrades as far down as to
>CSS support. If you don't have CSS, the site will still work, but looks
>awful.


Define "awful", a site sans CSS should look very clear,
information/content only.

Presentation is by definition 100% optional, if the content isn't 100%
clear without it then you have used CSS inappropriately (hard to do), or
more likely your markup is incorrect.


Headless

 
Reply With Quote
 
Andrew Tang
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      06-24-2003

"Paul F. Johnson" <> wrote in message
news ...

> Is there a "safe" level to assume the majority of browsers will be able to
> cope with using their pre-installed values or even if they have been
> played with?


One really good place to visit is this site http://www.csszengarden.com/

When you remove all CSS/images etc... it becomes just plain text as in a
document. It doesnt look like it was before but it isnt excatly awful, just
plain. I reckon this is what all sites should be able to degrade to, like a
text document but thats just me.

Andy


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
c is a low-level language or neither low level nor high level language pabbu C Programming 8 11-07-2005 03:05 PM
Wireless Connection Speed Degradation despite of Strong Signal Strength Netman Wireless Networking 5 10-29-2005 05:46 PM
Degradation Chakra ASP .Net 3 04-23-2005 01:30 AM
Performance degradation Boo R. Ghost ASP .Net 2 05-12-2004 06:05 AM
Multithreaded Throughput Degradation in Java/Oracle Application Robert Brown Java 5 07-31-2003 05:05 AM



Advertisments
 



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57