Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Programming > ASP .Net > Newby question: Do overloaded members need to be declared as 'Public'?

Reply
Thread Tools

Newby question: Do overloaded members need to be declared as 'Public'?

 
 
Blue Streak
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      12-14-2005
I am referring to using VB.NET in ASP.NET.

TIA

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Bruce Barker
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      12-14-2005
only if you need public access. for sub-class use protected is preferred.

-- bruce (sqlwork.com)


"Blue Streak" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed) oups.com...
>I am referring to using VB.NET in ASP.NET.
>
> TIA
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
newby - error: 'rint' was not declared in this scope Darren L. Weber C++ 14 07-24-2006 03:52 PM
Difference between static final members and final static members(if any)? JFCM Java 4 02-07-2006 11:32 AM
declared or not declared ? JohnZing ASP .Net 3 02-05-2006 08:38 PM
Why static data members can be declared as the type of its own class lovecreatesbeauty C++ 6 09-02-2005 03:59 PM
Overloaded operators ---- members or friends masood.iqbal@lycos.com C++ 4 02-14-2005 06:55 PM



Advertisments