This link offers some perspective on the point you make about VS.NET 2003...
http://blogs.msdn.com/MikhailArkhipo...16/132886.aspx
Most developers I know develop ASP.NET Web applications with both (1) an
HTML editor, like Dreamweaver or Frontpage; AND (2) VS.NET 2003 opened at
the same time - with HTML-specific work done in the HTML editor, and all
code-behind and other programming work and test sessions launched in/from
VS.NET.
-HTH
"Rakesh Rajan" <rakeshrajan {at} mvps {dot} org> wrote in message
news:48533102-25E4-434A-9F68-...
> Hi,
>
> I would say Visual Studio .NET.
>
> The point where VSNET 2k3 had a weak area was page designing - this wasn't
> very easy in the environment. And that was exactly where Macromedia
> Dreamweaver had an edge.
>
> But Whidbey brings along improvements in this area which would hopefully
> make both coding and designing quite easy!
>
> --
> HTH,
> Rakesh Rajan
> MVP, MCSD
> http://www.msmvps.com/rakeshrajan/
>
>
>
> "Jassim Rahma" wrote:
>
>> What is the Best ASP.NET development environment? i am now using
>> macromedia HomeSite for ASP..
>>
>>
>>
>> Many Thanks,
>> Jassim Rahma
>>
>> *** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
>>