![]() |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Is it possible to compile Firefox so that it can run without X? I am
setting up a kiosk type machine and would like to make it as lean as possible and was thinking that if I could skip installing X it would be sweet. Can Firefox, (if compiled with some special flags or whatever), render without X installed? Thanks -Cam cameron |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
*** cameron escribió/wrote (Sun, 30 Jan 2005 16:00:57 -0600):
> Is it possible to compile Firefox so that it can run without X? I am > setting up a kiosk type machine and would like to make it as lean as > possible and was thinking that if I could skip installing X it would be > sweet. Can Firefox, (if compiled with some special flags or whatever), > render without X installed? Maybe... But where is it supposed to _display_ the result? -- -+ Álvaro G. Vicario - Burgos, Spain +- http://www.demogracia.com (la web de humor barnizada para la intemperie) ++ Manda tus dudas al grupo, no a mi buzón -+ Send your questions to the group, not to my mailbox -- Alvaro G. Vicario |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Where does X display the result?
-Cam Alvaro G. Vicario wrote: > *** cameron escribió/wrote (Sun, 30 Jan 2005 16:00:57 -0600): > >>Is it possible to compile Firefox so that it can run without X? I am >>setting up a kiosk type machine and would like to make it as lean as >>possible and was thinking that if I could skip installing X it would be >>sweet. Can Firefox, (if compiled with some special flags or whatever), >>render without X installed? > > > Maybe... But where is it supposed to _display_ the result? > cameron |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
*** cameron escribió/wrote (Sun, 30 Jan 2005 21:44:25 -0600):
> Where does X display the result? Sorry, I'm afraid I don't understand your needs. -- -+ Álvaro G. Vicario - Burgos, Spain +- http://www.demogracia.com (la web de humor barnizada para la intemperie) ++ Manda tus dudas al grupo, no a mi buzón -+ Send your questions to the group, not to my mailbox -- Alvaro G. Vicario |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
On 2005-01-30, Alvaro G. Vicario <> wrote:
> *** cameron escribió/wrote (Sun, 30 Jan 2005 16:00:57 -0600): >> Is it possible to compile Firefox so that it can run without X? I am >> setting up a kiosk type machine and would like to make it as lean as >> possible and was thinking that if I could skip installing X it would be >> sweet. Can Firefox, (if compiled with some special flags or whatever), >> render without X installed? > Maybe... But where is it supposed to _display_ the result? Frame buffer? -- -John () John Thompson |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Dynamically added TreeNode Control not render my custom attribute | venkyzealous | Software | 0 | 05-10-2008 03:46 PM |
| Render UpdatePanel within a CompositeControl | tal78 | Software | 0 | 11-20-2007 09:23 AM |
| Panasonic Factory SD card versus Tiger Direct? | Bill | DVD Video | 1 | 10-27-2004 11:48 AM |
| SmartCertify Direct | cc0275012 | A+ Certification | 12 | 09-16-2004 01:59 PM |
| How do I reinstall direct X? | Walter | A+ Certification | 2 | 11-08-2003 06:47 AM |