![]() |
|
|
|
#11 |
|
On 2005-01-30, Alvaro G. Vicario <> wrote:
> *** SCraig escribió/wrote (Sat, 29 Jan 2005 17:22:31 GMT): >> I notice that Firfox 1.0 uses a lot of my memory, about 100K or more at >> times, while IE used to use a lot less. Is there something that I can do >> to reduce the amount of memory that Firefox uses? And why does it use so >> much? > My Firefox (under Windows XP with 512MB of RAM) uses 16MB with a blank page > loaded. If I open, let's, say, www.microsoft.com, www.mozilla.org and > www.google.com, it uses to 23MB. I'm showing FireFox with 61MB resident and 15MB shared memory here on linux, with 9 tabs currently open. > As they've already told you, it's almost impossible to know how much memory > Explorer uses, but definitively, 100MB for Firefox seems too much. In any > case, I don't know what you're doing with it when it uses 100MB. Lots of tabs? Complex pages? -- -John () John Thompson |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
On 2/1/2005 2:47 AM Moz Champion exclaimed
> SCraig wrote: > >> "Alvaro G. Vicario" <> wrote in message >> news:y4l1p656g1z8$.... >> *** SCraig escribió/wrote (Sat, 29 Jan 2005 17:22:31 GMT): >> >>> I notice that Firfox 1.0 uses a lot of my memory, about 100K or more at >>> times, while IE used to use a lot less. Is there something that I >>> can do >>> to reduce the amount of memory that Firefox uses? And why does it >>> use so >>> much? >> >> >> >> My Firefox (under Windows XP with 512MB of RAM) uses 16MB with a blank >> page >> loaded. If I open, let's, say, www.microsoft.com, www.mozilla.org and >> www.google.com, it uses to 23MB. >> >> As they've already told you, it's almost impossible to know how much >> memory >> Explorer uses, but definitively, 100MB for Firefox seems too much. In any >> case, I don't know what you're doing with it when it uses 100MB. >> >> > Right now I have one version of Firefox open and I'm looking at the Google > newspage. Firefox is currently using 117MB of memory. Since I only have > 512 MB of memory that does seem like a lot. Also, occasionally, and for > know reason that I can figure out, Firefox will suddenly jump to about > 150MB. If someone could give me some hints about how to reduce the amount > of memory Firefox is using I'd appreciate it. I use Zone Alarm firewall > and > virus protection and Ad-aware so I know I don't have any viruses or spammer > programs. I use Windows XP SP-2. So what should I do? > > Thanks, > Craig > > > Sorry, your response is cut and pasted above, you need Quotefix for your > program. > > > 117MB as reported by what (program/utility) as each program/utility may > be different in what it 'sees' as usage. > > Um, modern systems assign memory to the programs that require it, its > there to be used, so why worry about if a program uses 117 or 150 MB, as > you state, its not even a third of your total. > > A specific web page can easily increase the memory requirements, > dependent on how many images there are on the page. In this day of > broadband, its really not unusual to see sites with 5 or even 20MB of > images. Load a few sites, and your memory can get used up quite quickly. > Windows will allot memory to the program as the program requires it, and > it may add in 'chunks' - i.e. if memory usage is assigned (by Windows) > to be 120 MB then when it hits 118 mb Windows may assign 30mb more in > one go - resulting in a 'jump' to 150MB. > > Explorer doesnt report this, becaue many of its caches/utilities are > subsumed within the system as noted. > > > Memory reporting utilities can be quite misleading. For example (this is > from a Macintosh but it may be similar on Windows): > > Using 9x or earlier on the Mac. > Assign 30mb to a program (Browser type) > Open the program and go to 2 web pages > Usage shows 24mb in use. > Close the program, re-assign memory to 48mb > Start program and go to the same 2 web pages > Usage shows 36mb in use! > Do the same with 100mb assigned > Usage goes up to 76mb! > > Obviously, the program ISNT using any more memory, because the two pages > are the same! > > Okay, the above example is from a non memory management system (and an > old system), in which the user assigns memory, but it does show that > usage is NOT reported accurately at all. > > > Unless you are getting out of memory messages from Windows, I suggest > you turn off the display showing usage and let Windows manage the memory > for you. Its really quite good at that. > I agree with Moz Champion. (Even if he IS using a Mac Please describe the steps you are taking to arrive at the memory usage that you are reporting here? If I do a 3 fingered salute and look at firefox.exe on the "Processes" tab with 2 firefox windows open, 1 with 10 tabs and the other with 2 tabs, I show 97,492K Mem Usage and a peak of 98,224K. This is with XP-Pro SP2. pd |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| OCZ 6GB Triple-Channel 1333 MHz DDR3 Memory Kit | Admin | Front Page News | 0 | 02-16-2009 01:27 PM |
| memory upgrade | -D- | A+ Certification | 1 | 02-03-2007 01:01 AM |
| Re: What memory to use? | me | A+ Certification | 0 | 12-14-2004 03:33 AM |
| Re: Memory stick question | Nildram | A+ Certification | 1 | 01-14-2004 02:41 PM |
| Half memory: lost? | Joe | A+ Certification | 4 | 09-04-2003 08:57 PM |